Observer free choice in quantum mechanics?

Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Does quantum mechanics allow an observer free choice of measurement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interactions with the invironment tend to "push" a physical system into an eigenstate of some observable. I guess you can call this a "measurement" without an observer.

This is what "decoherence" is all about.
 


The concept of observer free choice in quantum mechanics is a highly debated topic among physicists and philosophers. In classical mechanics, the outcome of a measurement is determined by the initial conditions and the laws of physics. However, in quantum mechanics, the outcome of a measurement is probabilistic and can be influenced by the act of observation.

Some argue that this suggests an element of free will or choice for the observer in choosing which measurement to make. This idea is often referred to as the "measurement problem" in quantum mechanics. However, others argue that the apparent randomness of quantum mechanics is simply due to our lack of understanding and that there is no true free choice involved.

It is important to note that the concept of free will is a philosophical and metaphysical question, and not something that can be answered definitively by science. While quantum mechanics may offer some interesting insights and perspectives on the nature of reality and our role as observers, it is ultimately up to individual interpretation and belief.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top