Laplace Transform: Learn How To Solve Problems Quickly

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Laplace transform, particularly its application in solving differential equations. Participants seek resources and clarification on the process of using Laplace transforms, including finding inverse transforms and applying initial conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in understanding Laplace transforms and requests resources for learning.
  • Another participant explains the process of applying the Laplace transform to differential equations, emphasizing the conversion to algebraic equations.
  • A question is raised about the necessity of finding the inverse Laplace transform and the meaning of a variable in a specific problem.
  • A detailed explanation is provided regarding the formula for the Laplace transform and its application to derivatives, including specific examples and initial conditions.
  • There is mention of the harmonic oscillator and the role of a constant in the context of the problem being discussed.
  • A participant suggests that further details are needed to complete the example problem and invites others to contribute.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the best approach to solving the problems, and there are varying levels of understanding and clarity regarding the Laplace transform process.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note missing details and assumptions in the explanations provided, indicating that further clarification may be necessary for complete understanding.

rishid
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Anyone good source on how to do Laplace transforms? My teacher is really really bad and I have a test next week on it. I have no clue on how to do any of them. :cry: Example problems attached.

Thanks for any help at all. :smile:
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
The idea is to take the Laplace transform on both sides of the differential equation and use the properties of the laplace transform of derivatives to turn your differential equation into an algebraic equation.
Then, if you can find the inverse laplace transform of f(t) you have solved the equation.
You don't need to integrate if you may use the integral/laplace transform-tables.
 
Why do I need to find the inverse laplace transform?

You got any idea what the I represents in problem 1?

Thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:
When you take the transform, you are no longer solving the differential equation for [itex]x(t)[/itex], you are now solving a differential equation for the Laplace transform. After you solve that equation, you need to reverse the transform to find [itex]x(t)[/tex], which is the original problem.<br /> <br /> The Laplace transform is given by the formula<br /> <br /> [tex]\tilde{f}(s)=\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-st}f(t)dt[/tex]<br /> <br /> for example, the laplace transform for the derivative is given by<br /> <br /> [tex]\widetilde{f'}(s)=\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-st}f'(t)dt=-sf(0)+s\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-st}f(t)dt[/tex]<br /> <br /> so<br /> <br /> [tex]\widetilde{f'}(s)=-sf(0)+s\tilde{f}(s)[/tex]<br /> <br /> using this result<br /> <br /> [tex]\widetilde{f''}(s)=-sf'(0)+s\widetilde{f'}(s)=-sf'(0)-s^{2}f(0)+s^{2}\tilde{f}(s)[/tex]<br /> <br /> now, you only need to transform the whole equation, solve for [itex]\tilde{x}(s)[/itex] and find the inverse transform as Galileo said (using tables). For further reference check Boyce DiPrima ode's book.<br /> <br /> Ah... and your equation represents an harmonic oscilator under the influence of an external force [itex]f(t)[/itex]. The [itex]I[/itex] must be a constant. The amplitude of a pulse.<br /> <br /> Lets do 1. for example.<br /> <br /> given [itex]x(0)=0,x'(0)=0[/itex] implies that<br /> <br /> [tex]\widetilde{x'}(s)=s\tilde{x}(s),\widetilde{x''}(t)=s^{2}\tilde{x}(s)[/tex]<br /> <br /> and <br /> <br /> [tex]\mathcal{L}[\delta(t-c)]=\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-st}\delta(t-c)dt[/tex]<br /> <br /> which by definition of the delta function [itex]f(y)=\int f(x)\delta(x-y)dx[/itex] yields<br /> <br /> [tex]\mathcal{L}[\delta(t-c)]=e^{-sc}[/tex]<br /> <br /> so [itex]\mathcal{L}[\delta(t)]=1[/itex]. Now, transforming the whole equation, <br /> <br /> [tex]\widetilde{mx''(t)+kx(t)}=\widetilde{I\delta}(t)[/tex]<br /> <br /> due linearity<br /> <br /> [tex]\widetilde{mx''(t)+kx(t)}=m\widetilde{x''}(t)+k\tilde{x}(t)=I\widetilde{\delta}(t)[/tex]<br /> <br /> substituting<br /> <br /> [tex](ms^{2}+k)\tilde{x}(s)=I[/tex]<br /> <br /> so<br /> <br /> [tex]\tilde{x}(s)=\frac{I}{m}\frac{1}{s^{2}+\omega^{2}}[/tex]<br /> <br /> and given the fact that (try calculating this one, good exercise)<br /> <br /> [tex]\mathcal{L}[sen(\omega t)]=\frac{\omega}{s^{2}+\omega^{2}}[/tex]<br /> <br /> implies<br /> <br /> [tex]\tilde{x}(s)=\mathcal{L}[x(t)]=\frac{I}{m\omega}\mathcal{L}[sen(\omega t)][/tex]<br /> <br /> Inverting<br /> <br /> [tex]x(t)=\frac{I}{m\omega}sen(\omega t)[/tex]<br /> <br /> There is some details missing, but I am too tired and i think this show the main point. You need to use your initial conditions and the homogeneous solution. Anyone here is willing to complete the exercise?[/itex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K