Photon radius and affected energy in double-slit experiments

gnarlan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all, these questions have nagged me for years and I have never found a text or a paper that even addresses them.

Regarding photon "radius", what is the maximum width that two slits can be spaced which still permits the double-slit phenomenon to occur? Would this be a valid method of determining photon "radius"? Additionally, is that maximum width dependent upon frequency or is it the same for all photons?

Relatedly, if at any point beyond the slits, we attempt to observe the photon, we of course lose our interference pattern. But, does the photon that arrives at the photosensitive sheet possesses the same energy-momentum as the "pre-split" photon?

I appreciate any insight from you experimenters our there :) Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A photon does not have a "radius". It is the quantized version of a classical wave packet, and its size depends on how close the wave is to a pure plane wave. To obtain coherence over a larger distance you want a smaller spread in frequency and propagation vector. Experimentally this is determined by the quality of your laser.

The photon, when it reaches the screen, has the same frequency it started with, and the same energy.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top