How fast will water drain from this area?

  • Thread starter Thread starter leakyrivot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the rate at which water drains from a reservoir with specific dimensions and hole sizes. Participants explore fluid dynamics principles, including the Bernoulli Equation and the impact of different shapes on pressure and flow rates. The scope includes theoretical and mathematical reasoning related to fluid mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Jon seeks to understand how fast water will drain from a reservoir with irregular dimensions and specific hole sizes.
  • One participant suggests using the Bernoulli Equation and the Equation of Continuity, emphasizing the importance of the container's shape.
  • Another participant provides a formula for estimating drainage time, assuming a uniform cross-sectional area and discussing the orifice coefficient.
  • There is a debate about whether the shape of the container affects pressure at the bottom, with some arguing it only depends on the height of the water column, while others contend that varying shapes influence pressure differently.
  • A later reply suggests that the area of the tank is not constant and proposes a computational approach to evaluate the drainage over varying heights using a function for the cross-sectional area.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the influence of container shape on pressure and drainage rates. While some agree on the use of specific equations, there is no consensus on the implications of shape and pressure relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may require calculus due to the varying height and shape of the tank, and there are unresolved assumptions regarding the cross-sectional area as a function of height.

leakyrivot
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I found this site searching for formulas that took into account gravity, volume, and pressure, to determine how fast water would drain out of a given size hole.

In short, I'm into boats, trying to figure out given a certain size structure, how fast it would drain given certain sized water-letter-outers..

This is my first post on this site. I'm a Computer Science guy, supposedly a math expert but when it comes to anything real world, certainly not..

So, what I've got is an area that's (very irregular shape, but all put together) ~2 feet wide X ~2 feet deep X ~12 feet long.

I'm trying to figure out, if filled with water, how fast it will drain with 2 X 3-inch diameter holes placed at the bottom of the "reservoir".

Any idea where to start with this?

Thanks,

Jon
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hey why don't you mail me at << e-mail address deleted by Mentor >>then we can discuss it.
by the way you need to use the Bernoulli Equation, Equation of continuity from fluid dynamics and differential equations.But just mail me the shape of container as an image if you can bcs. it matters!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's best to discuss this problem here so many people can help answer your problem. Bhaskar is pretty much right in the general topics involved (execpt it uses calculus instead of D.E.), but what he didn't tell you is the problem is a common one with a known solution.

If we assume your tank has a uniform cross-sectional area with respect to height, then the equation you're looking for is:

t = \frac{2*A_{t}\left(\sqrt{z_{1}}-\sqrt{z_{2}}\right)}{C_{d}*A_{o}*\sqrt{2g}}

A_t is the cross-sectional area of the tank, A_o is the cross-sectional area of the orifice(s), and C_d is the orifice coefficient. z_1 and z_2 are the beginning and ending height of the fluid in the tank. You can probably assume C_d to be something like 0.6 t 0.7, it depends on what your holes look like.

This should give you a good start on what you're after.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You will need differential equations because the pressure is directly proportional to instantaneous height.And shape matters, for different shapes pressure at bottom is different-ex. spherical,hemispherical,conical etc... and for straightforward shapes like cubical only common solutions are available.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pressure at bottom depends on the shape? I don't think so...it just depends on the height of column of water directly on top of the hole. What depends on the shape is the volume of water remaining to be drained.
 
Yes i know that but what if the height is varying due to hemispherical shape or any other curved shapes?Only at a single point pressure is =dgh.
 
Well, 1994Bhaskar, you had me confused...on one sentence you do say that "pressure is directly proportional to the height" and in the next you say that "for different shapes pressure at the bottom is different".

So, pressure is only proportional to the height and the equation above applies.
Replace the letter z with the letter h, for height, and
Lump all constant values into a single constant, K, and write the formula like this:

t = K x At x ( sqrt(h1) - sqrt(h2) )

(sorry, I don't know latex)

Now, the area of the tank (At) is not constant (t is for tank not for time); instead, the tank has different cross-sectional areas at different heights...in other words, the area A is a function of the height...somebody needs to come up with a function A(h) depending on the profile along the wall of the tank.

So, for lack of calculus abilities, I would simply take the formula given above and put it in a computer program...this is how I would approach it:

Write a function A(h) that can be called from within a loop, decide on a dh (delta h) and evaluate the "differential" equation from initial height h1 all the way down to almost zero and add the delta times

t = 0.0
dh = 0.1
for h from h1 down to dh, every dh:
dt = K x A(h) x ( sqrt(h) - sqrt(h - dh)
t = t + dt
end loop

I think that would do.

Comments?

For functions, I typically think y=f(x).
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
466
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K