Is Center-of-Mass Supraliminal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
In Newtonian physics, the center-of-mass of a group of particles depends on the instantaneous positions of the particles, no matter how far apart they are or how fast they are moving relative to each other.

What about under SR? Is the center-of-mass of a group of particles determined instantaneously or is it delayed because of the limitation of the speed of light?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's instantaneous. I don't see how it could even make sense to make it not instantaneous. To determine the speed-of-light delay, you'd have to know the distance to the point in question, but you don't know the point in question yet.
 
The "determining" the center of mass does not involve any object actually moving so is not subject to a light speed limit.
 
What about center of mass versus center of gravity? Don't gravity waves, under GR, travel at the speed of light?
 
It is my understanding that "centre of mass" is, in general, frame-dependent in relativity. All observers agree on the "centre of momentum" frame (the frame in which total momentum is zero) and that the centre of mass moves with the same velocity as the centre of momentum frame, but they may disagree on its location.

Reference: Rindler, W. (2006), Relativity: Special, General and Cosmological, 2nd ed, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-856732-5, p.126, exercise 6.5.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top