Max aircraft range - electric powered

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the maximum range of electric-powered RC aircraft, focusing on the application of theoretical models and equations to understand the factors influencing range, such as battery energy density, propulsion efficiency, and glide ratio. Participants explore various battery technologies and their implications for aircraft design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a model for maximum range based on optimal velocity, energy capacity of the battery, and propulsion efficiency, leading to a fundamental range equation.
  • Another participant calculates that with Li-Ion batteries, the fundamental range could be approximately 100 km, and with specific parameters, suggests a maximum range of 1780 km for an RC aircraft.
  • Discussion includes various battery types, with one participant noting that Lithium Sulfur batteries could extend the range to 1390 miles, while Lithium primary batteries could reach up to 1980 miles.
  • One participant mentions the glide ratio of modern jets and suggests that improving battery energy density could enable electric regional jets to achieve significant ranges.
  • Some participants express interest in literature related to electric ducted fans, although there is uncertainty about the relevance of the material to range calculations.
  • A historical reference is made to an RC model aircraft that successfully crossed the Atlantic, highlighting the potential of lightweight designs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views regarding the range of electric aircraft, the efficiency of different propulsion systems, and the potential of various battery technologies. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the optimal approach or specific range estimates.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their assumptions regarding battery mass fractions and propulsion efficiencies. There is also a lack of consensus on the glide ratios applicable to different aircraft types.

mheslep
Gold Member
Messages
376
Reaction score
714
I'm trying to come up with some ballpark ranges for RC electric powered aircraft. The literature I find so far on range, like the Breguet range equation, seems focused on mass change from fuel consumption which is not the case in battery powered electric aircraft. So I thought I would start from scratch for my edification and invite sanity checks. McKay's reference, here, provided guidance. Below I've substituted terms convenient for my design.

Fundamentally, the maximum range is some optimal aircraft velocity x time aloft, and time aloft is the total energy carried divided by the rate at which it is used, i.e. power, corrected for the efficiency of the propulsion system:

R = Vopt x (Ebatt/P) x ε
where:
R = maximum range
Ebatt = energy capacity of the battery
ε = propulsion efficiency
P = power​

and since force is power / velocity:

R = (Ebatt/Fthrust) ε
for level flight:

Fthrust = Drag
Lift = mg

or

Fthrust = mg (D/L)​

where:
m = aircraft mass
g = gravity
L/D = well known lift to drag ratio, or the glide ratio.​

then
R = Ebatt x ε x (L/D) / mg
Ebatt = Cbatt x me
where:
Cbatt = battery specific energy
me = mass of battery​

let
fbatt = fraction of aircraft mass dedicated to the battery
and
me = fbatt m​

then
R = Cbatt x fbatt x m x ε x (L/D) / (mg)
finally:
R = ( Cbatt/g ) x fbatt x ε x (L/D)

The term fbatt x ε x (L/D) is dimensionless. The fundamental range dependent on just carried energy is C/g.

Next up, some numbers.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Li Ion batteries are just short of 1 megajoule per kg, so in SI units C=1e6, g=10, the 'fundamental' range of a Li Ion powered aircraft is C/g = 100 km (62 miles). That applies to any aircraft so powered, of any size and air frame BTW.

Now for the dimensionless bit, the parameters.

Propulsion efficiency:
ε = ηbatt x ηfan x ηemotor

Common efficiencies for the battery and the motor are ~93%. If a prop maxes out at 85%, I'm guessing a duct-ed fan w/ vanes can also hit 93%, making the overall efficiency a convenient ε=0.8

Glide Ratio:
Best powered aircraft glide ratio to my knowledge is the Virgin Atlantic Global flyer. The Flyer achieved an L/D = 37.

Battery mass fraction:
I don't know. Commercial aircraft like a 747 top off with f=0.5. I'm guessing I can stuff f=0.6 in the airframe.

This RC 'Global Flyer' design gives a multiplier of fbatt x ε x (L/D) = 17.8
so Rmax li-ion = 1780 km (1100 miles)
 
Last edited:
I have some literature on electric ducted fans that I think gives some expressions for range and endurance, but I don't have it with me right now.
 
Buy a blimp covered in flexible photo-voltaic materials.

(sorry. just had to subscribe to my favorite topic. :redface:)
 
I note 1 MJ/kg takes the electric Flyer from New York to Bermuda (774 miles). Lithium Sulfur has demonstrated 1.26 MJ/kg, which would extend Rmax to 1390 miles. Still wont' cross the Atlantic (Newfoundland to Scotland) at 1900 miles
 
Last edited:
Ah, a Lithium primary battery (no recharge) Li thionyl chloride goes to 1.8MJ => 1980 miles. Primary batteries are often low power density though.
 
jhae2.718 said:
I have some literature on electric ducted fans that I think gives some expressions for range and endurance, but I don't have it with me right now.
Look forward to it.
 
Interestingly, I see an RC 'model' aircraft (i.e. less than 11 pounds) crossed the Atlantic for the first time in 2003, using 2.2 kg of fuel (Coleman stove fuel).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spirit_of_Butts_Farm
220px-Tam5.jpg
 
I see the glide ratio of some modern jets is 20:1. So to build an electric regional jet w legs of a 1000 mi (1700km), battery energy density needs to improve less than 2X, to 1.8 mj/kg: R=180km * .8 * .5 * 20. That is, as soon as an e motor comes along w the same specific power of a gas turbine fan engine (7kw/kg).
 
  • #10
mheslep said:
Look forward to it.

I was mistaken, it doesn't have anything on range. There are some equations for static thrust, power required, though. Let me know if you want those.

The booklet is from 1977, and is "Ducted Fans for Light Aircraft" by R.W. Hovey.
 
  • #11
jhae2.718 said:
I was mistaken, it doesn't have anything on range. There are some equations for static thrust, power required, though. Let me know if you want those.

The booklet is from 1977, and is "Ducted Fans for Light Aircraft" by R.W. Hovey.
Thanks. That reference led me to another which cites Hovey.

http://books.google.com/books?id=Yc...ns for Light Aircraft" by R.W. Hovey.&f=false

By Piolenc and Vwright. They walk through a ducted fan design example which has duct efficiency at 0.9, fan efficiency at 0.9, for a total of 0.81, i.e. less than a prop at its best?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
30K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
13K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K