Sum over histories and double slit?

beatlemaniacj
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I was recently studying Feynman's sum-over-histories approach to quantum probability. I also was reading an interesting paper on the double slit experiment. How do these two work together. Do some of the probability waves not have a out of phase partner to interfere with itself?

On a related not, what's the difference between the proxy wave, and Feynman's probability waves.

If the proxy wave is fictitious, how do atoms resist other atoms passing through it.

I know this is a lengthy question but please try to answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The easiest way to do the "sum over histories" for the 2 slit experiment, is to take the classical paths (2 of them) and just simply add up e^iS/h for the 2 different paths to get an amplitude. The probability is of course the absolute square of the amplitude. There is of course a normalizing factor, but that can be sometimes annoying to get, and I can't remember the details of that for the 2-slit experiment at this moment.
 
And that value (absolute square of the amplitude) would be the probability of the electron going through both slits?
 
No, the probability that the electron arrives at that spot in the detector. There is no probability for the electron "going through both slits".
 
This still applies in the case of an interference pattern when only one electron is fired.
 
Yes it does. You sum over both paths, but that doesn't mean the electron physically moves through both slits.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top