Mechanical Time Dilation: Explained

akashdgr8
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
when the expression for time dilation was derived the clock assumed used the light signal to progress but the normal clocks which work using chemical energy or the stored potential energy in the spring must not be influenced with the relative velocity
can anyone explain me the mechanical reason for time dilation in ordinary clocks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, welcome to the Forums!

There's no clock assumed in the derivation of the Lorentz Transformation (LT). Basically, time dilation is one component of a 4d transform that is the natural consequence of the constancy of the maximum speed (which also happens to be that of light).

Then, once people understood how time is affected by the LT, explanations were devise to try to make it clear, light-clocks were used only then.
 
It just depends on your notion of time, and what it effects. You have to consider, KE in not relative. to clear this up, it is though that ALL things tend to slow down at high velocity, because of the dilation in time. The truth is that we don't exactly know what time is, we just observe it like every thing else :)
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top