Rules - Expectations in using the writer's forum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forum Rules
AI Thread Summary
Writers seeking assistance with science-fiction or fantasy stories in this forum must adhere to specific guidelines regarding speculation. While speculative elements are encouraged within fictional worlds, discussions must not involve real-world science or challenge established scientific principles. Writers are required to clarify how their fictional worlds differ from reality. Internal mechanics of fictional universes can be debated, but inquiries about real-world implications of speculative technologies are prohibited. This is particularly crucial for near-future and hard science fiction, where a clear distinction between real science and fiction is necessary. Personal theories are not permitted, and any content resembling crackpot theories will be removed. Members wishing to explore speculative or alternate evolution questions should frame them as inquiries rather than assertions. The forum aims to foster creativity while maintaining a boundary against pseudoscience.
Messages
19,787
Reaction score
10,739
In this forum, it is possible for writers to ask for help with science-fiction or fantasy stories. Since science-fiction is speculative in nature, some degree of speculation is allowed here. However:

There can be no speculation about the real world and about known science. Rather, all speculative theories must be about a world which is different (although similar) from our own. Writers must give some kind of indication in what way their world is different from our world.

Discussions of the internal workings of a fictional universe are allowed but any attempt to discuss speculative fiction ideas with regard to the real world is not. For example: discussing the pros/cons/handwavium of a fictional technology with regards to a plot is perfectly ok but asking how such technology could be built in the real world and what the ramifications would be is not. This is a grey area and mentors reserve the right to close a thread when they think it violates this rule.

Members are advised to particularly take care during the discusson of near-future and hard science fiction; ensure a clear distinction between real science and speculative fiction. Personal theories are strictly not allowed.

The global guidelines are still in effect. This applies in particular to the forbidden topic list: https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3929007&postcount=2 Any obvious crackpottery and links to crackpot sites will be deleted.

For those members interested in writing their story without member input, please use one of the two thread prefixes when creating your thread.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So where do I post speculative or alternate evolution questions if they're not allowed here?
 
Ask them as questions rather than assertions of the way things are and you can get some answers.
Here is an example.
For example, "Why doesn't this (blah, blah, blah) work?".
Or, why isn't the corona virus considered to have been developed in a lab? (a recent question).
Try not to be too far out there.
 
JohnWDailey said:
So where do I post speculative or alternate evolution questions if they're not allowed here?
I get the impression that the rules are that your sci-fi related question mustn't challenge scientific orthodoxy in the real world. It can surely challenge it in your fictional world! PF just needs to protect itself from crackpottery masquerading as science. It would be easy to air my ideas about spin 1/4 particles by claiming it's for a sci-fi. PF wants to avoid that.

That's how I see it anyway.
 
kered rettop said:
I get the impression that the rules are that your sci-fi related question mustn't challenge scientific orthodoxy in the real world. It can surely challenge it in your fictional world! PF just needs to protect itself from crackpottery masquerading as science. It would be easy to air my ideas about spin 1/4 particles by claiming it's for a sci-fi. PF wants to avoid that.

That's how I see it anyway.
That plus when you invent your own physics it is almost impossible to then ask, "what will happen to my world now?" Well, we don't know, you've changed physics and even small changes often have catastrophic consequences and result in paradoxes and nonsensical results when you really get down into the details.
 
  • Like
Likes kered rettop
Drakkith said:
That plus when you invent your own physics it is almost impossible to then ask, "what will happen to my world now?" Well, we don't know, you've changed physics and even small changes often have catastrophic consequences and result in paradoxes and nonsensical results when you really get down into the details.
Yay for The Willing Suspension of Disbelief!
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
16K
Replies
2
Views
659
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top