Kelvin water dropper generator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Kelvin water dropper generator is not designed for mass electricity production; it generates a high voltage potential but lacks significant power output. Efficiency and flow rate are inadequate for practical use, with most energy lost as heat upon impact. Comparatively, hydroelectric turbines convert gravitational potential energy into kinetic energy more effectively. The generator's operation results in minimal current flow, insufficient for powering loads.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kelvin water dropper generator mechanics
  • Knowledge of hydroelectric power generation principles
  • Familiarity with electrical potential and current flow concepts
  • Basic principles of energy conversion and efficiency
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the efficiency of hydroelectric turbines versus Kelvin water dropper generators
  • Explore the principles of energy loss in impact scenarios
  • Study the applications and limitations of pico hydro systems
  • Investigate high voltage generation methods and their practical uses
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and hobbyists interested in energy generation technologies, particularly those comparing traditional hydroelectric systems with innovative concepts like the Kelvin water dropper generator.

Rooted
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I have only recently found out about this idea (many thanks m.e.t.a.) and I am curious about it. Could it be used to produce electricity on a mass scale, and if not, why not? Is the efficiency of conversion from gravitational potential energy into electric potential energy less that the conversion to kinetic energy in a hydroelectric turbine, for example? Or is it perhaps related to the discrete rather than continuous nature of the high potential difference?

Thanks for your help,

Rooted
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would expect that both the efficiency and the maximal flow rate (a small stream per device) are too small to be useful.
You need several cubic meters per second to get any useful amount of power (with 100m height difference, 1m^3/s just corresponds to 100kW input power)

Wikipedia said:
Most of the energy is wasted as heat when the water drops land in the buckets.
 
Thanks mfb. The energy loss from impact is something I hadn't taken on board.
 
Rooted said:
Thanks mfb. The energy loss from impact is something I hadn't taken on board.

I don't think there is a minimum to this loss, since the electric field between the ring and the bucket will counteract gravity, so the drops could theoretically hit the water with zero speed.
 
Please pay attention to two very different kinds of apparatus: Hydroelectric power generators and Kelvin Water-drop generators.

Here are a few excerpts from the Wikipedia page on “hydroelectric generator”:

“Hydroelectric generators are found world-wide. In China the Three Gorges Dam generates 20,300 Megawatts and in the USA the Grand Coulee Dam generates 6,809 Megawatts.

Pico hydro is a term used for hydroelectric power generation of under 5 KW. It is useful in small, remote communities that require only a small amount of electricity. For example, to power one or two fluorescent light bulbs and a TV or radio for a few homes.[13]

Even smaller turbines of 200-300W may power a single home in a developing country with a drop of only 1 m (3 ft). Pico-hydro setups typically are run-of-the-river, meaning that dams are not used, but rather pipes divert some of the flow, drop this down a gradient, and through the turbine before returning it to the stream.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroelectricity

The purpose of the water-dropper is not to generate electric power. A Kelvin Water-drop generator generates a high voltage potential between its two electrodes. They may be buckets or spheres, but there is no significant amount of electrical power stored on the electrodes. A fully charged sphere, for example, may cause a few micro-amperes to flow during a short-circuit arc for a few microseconds. This is not a significant amount of power and would not power a load.

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
Thanks for your help. I need to think about this a bit more!

Cheers, Rooted
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K