Harnessing kinetic energy from impact of rain water

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the efficiency of harnessing kinetic energy from rainwater compared to using turbines to generate energy from collected water. It concludes that while raindrops can reach terminal velocities of up to 10 m/s, the actual energy harvested from individual raindrops is minimal due to their low mass and velocity. The consensus is that collecting water in larger quantities for turbine use is more effective than attempting to capture energy from the impact of falling raindrops, as evidenced by the lack of serious installations for rain energy harvesting.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of terminal velocity in physics
  • Knowledge of energy density and mass-energy relationships
  • Familiarity with turbine mechanics and energy generation
  • Basic principles of hydrodynamics and fluid mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the efficiency of water turbines in energy generation
  • Explore the principles of terminal velocity and its implications for energy capture
  • Investigate alternative renewable energy sources, particularly wind energy
  • Study existing technologies for rainwater collection and energy conversion
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, renewable energy researchers, and environmental scientists interested in optimizing energy generation methods and exploring the feasibility of rainwater energy harvesting.

piisexactly3
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I read in a science magazine that you would be able to generate more energy by collecting a mass of water and tipping it through a turbine than from generating energy from the impact of that mass of water as individual raindrops. Now this may simply be to do with the technology we have that can't collect enough useful energy from the impact of rainwater as opposed to turbines

But what confused about this is that that mass of water as rain has fallen from a great height where it has reached terminal velocity and so should have much more kinetic energy than merely being tipped from a small height.

I should mention that I do not have or am doing a degree in physics so I apologise if I'm being dumb, but was just very curious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are actually hoping to make use of the kinetic energy of the rain as it falls onto a receiver of some kind, you should consider just how little actual energy is involved. Raindrops reach a terminal velocity of no more than 10m/s for the largest drops ( mostly, we're talking 1 or 2 m/s) and the actual mass of rain falling in a shower could be only a few grammes on a paddle wheel or equivalent.
I think there would be much more energy available from the wind in most locations. The clue is that (ifaik) there are no serious installations for harvesting 'rain energy' and people have really tried most things where there is a chance of success.

The terminal velocity of large, massive objects is high (say 50 m/s) but there are very few of these around (just as well).
 
piisexactly3 said:
But what confused about this is that that mass of water as rain has fallen from a great height where it has reached terminal velocity and so should have much more kinetic energy than merely being tipped from a small height.
Compare the surface area of the biggest turbine we can build, with the surface area that collects water into a reservoir from a dam. Even if rain would have more energy per liter, it is so much simpler to collect huge amounts with less energy density and put them through a smaller, simpler to build turbine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K