Help with Delta Function & Spherical Electrostatic Potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the charge density, ρ(r), from a given spherically symmetrical electrostatic potential, V(r). The user has derived an expression for the electrostatic field, E(r), but is uncertain about incorporating the Dirac Delta function to represent singularities in the charge density. A suggestion is made to integrate the electric field over a sphere to find the total charge, which can indicate the presence of a point charge if the limit does not approach zero. The relationship between a 1/r potential and a point charge is highlighted, emphasizing that this scenario necessitates a delta function representation. The conversation underscores the importance of foundational principles in electrostatics for resolving such issues.
upsidedown314
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm having trouble with the following problem:
The spherically symmetrical electrostatic potential of a particular object is given (in spherical coordinates) by:
V(\vec{r})=V(r)=c\frac{exp{(\frac{-2r}{a})}}{4\pi\varepsilon r} (1+\frac{r}{a})
I found the electrostatic field in spherical coords (I think it's right),
\vec{E}(\ver{r})=\frac{c}{4 \pi \varepsilon} (\frac{2}{a r} +\frac{1}{r^2} +\frac{2}{a^2}) exp(\frac{-2 r}{a})\hat{r}
Now I'm looking for the charge density \rho(\vec{r}) in spherical coords.
My problem is with representing the singularities with the Dirac Delta function.
I'm not sure how to do this.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Compute \rho first and then we shall see whether a delta-Dirac is necessary.

Daniel.
 
I got
\rho=\frac{-c}{r \pi a^2} (r-a+1) exp(\frac{-2 r}{a})
Will this need a Delta Function?
 
This looks like a hydrogen atom type charge density?
An easy way to find a delta function is to guess at where it is, integrate the E field over a sphere of radius r around it.. that will tell you the total charge inside the sphere as a function of r.. then take the limit as r goes to zero.. if that doesn't go zero, then you must have a point charge at the center of the sphere.
 
Go back to basics. A 1/r potential, being generated by a point charge of unit magnitude, is a green's function, and its source is represented by a delta function -- in this case delta(r). As r->0 your potential goes like 1/r, so there's a delta function. for practical purposes, del squared(1/r) = - delta(r) -- there could be a few 2pi s I've missed). With the chain rule, that's all you need. (Also see Jackson, or any E&M or Boundary Values or Potential Theory or...)

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top