Calculate the circulation of vector field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the circulation of the vector field \(\vec{v} = \cos(x)\sin(y)\vec{i} - \sin(x)\cos(y)\vec{j}\) around a square defined by the limits of \(x\) and \(y\). The initial approach involves integrating along one side of the square and multiplying the result by four, which is confirmed to be correct, yielding a total circulation of 8. The use of Stokes' theorem is suggested as a verification method, showing that the curl of the vector field leads to the same result. The calculations confirm that the integral evaluates correctly, reinforcing the accuracy of the method. The final conclusion is that the circulation around the square is indeed 8.
Jonsson
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

I've got a vector field which you can see here: Sketch of the vector field . It is: \vec{v} = \cos(x)\,\sin(y)\vec{i}-\sin(x)\,\cos(y)\vec{j}

Say I want to find the circulation around the square formed by -\frac{\pi}{2} \, \leq x \leq \, \frac{\pi}{2} and -\frac{\pi}{2} \, \leq y \leq \, \frac{\pi}{2}. I think that I should do this by finding the circulation along one of the sides, and multiply by 4 (I can tell from the vector field that the circulation along one of the sides is going to be equal to every other side.

This is where I become unconfident. \int_{y = -\frac{\pi}{2}}^{y = \frac{\pi}{2}}\vec{v}\,\mathrm{d}\vec{r} Please correct me if I am wrong. Any criticism is appreciated:

My \mathrm{d}\vec{r} = \mathrm{d}y\vec{j} along the y-axis, for the first side: (\Delta y = -\frac{\pi}{2}, x = -\frac{\pi}{2}).

\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos(x)\,\sin(y) \, \mathrm{d}y -\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\sin(x)\,\cos(y) \, \mathrm{d}y

\cos(-\frac{\pi}{2}) = 0, so the first integral is equal to zero.

-\sin(-\frac{\pi}{2})\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\cos(y) \, \mathrm{d}y = \int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\cos(y) \, \mathrm{d}y = [\sin(y)]_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} = \sin(\frac{\pi}{2}) - \sin(-\frac{\pi}{2}) = 2

First question:
Is the above correct?

Second question:
Can you think of any additional criticism?

Thank you for your time.

Kind regards,
Marius
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct if you multiply your result by 4 to get the value of the line integral ##I=8##.

You can check the result using Stokes' theorem $$\oint \vec{v}\cdot d\vec l=\int_S \vec {\nabla}\times \vec v \cdot \hat n~dS$$Here, ##\vec {\nabla}\times \vec v=-2\cos(x)\cos(y)~\hat z##. We have already chosen clockwise line integration therefore ##\hat n=-\hat z##.Thus, $$\int_S \vec {\nabla}\times \vec v \cdot \hat n~dS=+2\int_S\cos(x)\cos(y)dx~dy=2\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\cos(x)dx\int_{-\frac{\pi}{2}}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\cos(y)dy=8.$$
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Back
Top