Frequency Stability: What Does 2 Parts in 10E10 Mean?

AI Thread Summary
Frequency stability of a laser described as 2 parts in 10E10 indicates a dimensionless normalized shift of 2 x 10^-10 relative to the central frequency. This means the frequency can vary by 0.02 nm around the mean wavelength. Understanding this terminology is crucial for calculating the actual frequency shift using the central frequency. The discussion clarifies that while the concept of frequency stability is well-known, the specific phrasing can be confusing. Accurate interpretation of this stability metric is essential for applications relying on precise laser frequencies.
Stu165
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know what it means to say that the frequency stability of a laser is 2 parts in 10E10, I gather that it means that the frequency shifts 0.02nm each side of the mean wavelength. But I can't find any resources that use the term parts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The shift is usually expressed as a normalised shift w.r.t. the central laser frequency.

\frac{\Delta\nu}{\nu_0}

This quantity is dimensionless and thus has no units.

Claude.
 
I know that equation and all the coherence stuff, it's just the terminology of 2 parts in 10e10, has thrown me and how to get the shift from that.
 
Well,

\frac{\Delta\nu}{\nu_0} = 2 \times 10^{-10}

If you know the central frequency of the laser, you can figure out the exact amount of shift.

Claude.
 
Last edited:
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top