Is the Goldbach Conjecture Finally Proven? New Proof on arXiv Sparks Debate

  • Thread starter Thread starter eddybob123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture Proof
AI Thread Summary
A new proof of the Goldbach Conjecture has been posted on arXiv, raising skepticism among forum members. Concerns include the author's background as an Electrical Engineer with no prior publications in pure mathematics. The proof's lack of LaTeX formatting and reliance on Wikipedia and MathWorld for references further diminish its credibility. Many participants express doubt about its validity and suggest waiting for a professional journal's review before considering it legitimate. The discussion highlights the importance of rigorous standards in mathematical proofs.
eddybob123
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
Hi, I found this proof on arxiv just yesterday, though it was published on March 18. I don't know if it is right, but can you guys check it? Is it right?
http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.4649
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1) The person is not a mathematician, but an Electrical Engineer
2) He hasn't published any paper in pure mathematics
3) The paper is not written in LaTeX
4) He references wikipedia and mathworldThese four points together make me doubt very much that the proof is valid. Of course, maybe the proof is valid, but I'm really not going to bother with reading it until a professional journal publishes it.
The above 4 points are usually enough to separate a genuine paper from a false paper.
 
I guess you're right...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
48
Views
13K
Replies
50
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top