Explaining Inertia: Box B Moving Left When A Moves Right

  • Thread starter Thread starter x86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia
AI Thread Summary
When a force is applied to box A, causing it to move right, box B can move left due to the effects of friction. The movement of box B depends on the coefficient of friction between the two boxes and the magnitude of the applied force. If the friction is strong and the force is weak, both boxes move together. Conversely, if the friction is weak and the force is strong, box B will lag behind, moving to the left relative to box A. Understanding these dynamics clarifies why box B does not simply follow box A's movement.
x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18
Box B sits on top of box A. IF we apply a force to box A and cause it to move to the right; then box B moves to the left.

Why? Why doesn't box B also move to the right? Can someone explain this? I keep doing such experiments but can't figure it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x86 said:
Box B sits on top of box A. IF we apply a force to box A and cause it to move to the right; then box B moves to the left.

Why? Why doesn't box B also move to the right? Can someone explain this? I keep doing such experiments but can't figure it out.

It depends on the coefficient of friction between the boxes, and on how much force is applied. If the friction force is high and the applied force is small, the two boxes move together. If the friction force is small and the force on the lower box is high, then the force of friction between the boxes is not high enough to accelerate the top box at the same rate as the lower box. The top box does not move to the left -- it moves to the right, but more slowly than the lower box.

Does that make sense now?
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top