What is the Meaning of ##:=## in Mathematics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Von Neumann
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
The symbol ##:=## is commonly used in mathematics to denote "defined as" or "definition." While it is recognized as standard notation, its use is often discouraged in formal papers and textbooks in favor of written explanations. Alternatives like \equiv, \stackrel{\Delta}{=}, and \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} are also available, but ##:=## remains widely used, particularly in informal settings. Many mathematicians prefer using this notation on blackboards or in casual discussions. Overall, while it is a useful shorthand, clarity in communication is prioritized in formal contexts.
Von Neumann
Messages
101
Reaction score
4
My calc professor always used to use the symbol ##:=## when defining a quantity.

For example, say we want to evaluate the integral ## \int x \sqrt{1+x^2} dx ##. So we might say, "Let ##u:=1+x^2 ##" and then continue to easily evaluate the integral.

I haven't seen this anywhere else and I'm wondering if this is standard notation.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It is standard notation yes. It usually denotes "defined as" or "definition"
 
Yes, it's standard notation. It's not the only notation people use though. But you'll see some people use it.

The use of this notation in papers and math books is discouraged though. It's always better to write it out in words. For the same reason, things like ##\forall## and ##\exists## rarely show up in math texts.

But many people use it informally or on blackboard.
 
Yes. I've seen several alternatives, such as \equiv, \stackrel{\Delta}{=} and \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}, but using := is also extremely common.

I'm not sure if this is just me, but it seems to be more common in a slightly informal presentation.

EDIT: Double-ninja'd, ugh.
 
Ninja powah!
 
Thanks fellas!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top