SteveDC
- 39
- 0
A bike rolling down a hill will on average stay upright for longer than a free standing bike? I can't think of a way to explain why this is?
The discussion centers on the mechanics of a bicycle rolling down a hill and why it tends to stay upright longer compared to a free-standing bike. Participants explore various factors influencing stability, including steering geometry, gyroscopic effects, and the role of speed.
Participants express differing views on the relative importance of gyroscopic effects versus steering geometry (trail) in maintaining a bicycle's upright position. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent to which each factor contributes to stability.
Some claims depend on specific definitions of terms like "trail" and "gyroscopic effect," and the discussion does not resolve the mathematical relationships or conditions under which these effects operate.
SteveDC said:A bike rolling down a hill will on average stay upright for longer than a free standing bike? I can't think of a way to explain why this is?
solar71 said:The wheels of a bicycle when spinning act as a gyro.
Probably the most important contribution to the understanding of bicycle physics is due to David Jones (Physics Today 23, April 1970) [1]. His first attempt to design an unridable bicycle by eliminating gyroscopic torques failed. Bicycles with tiny ball bearings instead of wheels proved to be perfectly ridable. Also compensating or even overcompensating gyroscopic torques by an additional dummy wheel turning in the opposite direction had no effect on rideability. His second attempt was successful. Bicycles which had a negative trail, i.e. a contact point K in front of the projection of the steering axis (see Fig. 1) were unridable. This demonstrated the importance of the steering geometry for bicycle riding.
CWatters said:That effect has been shown to be minimal or non-existent compared to the effect of trail in the steering geometry.