SteveDC
- 39
- 0
A bike rolling down a hill will on average stay upright for longer than a free standing bike? I can't think of a way to explain why this is?
A bicycle rolling down a hill remains upright longer than a free-standing bike due to the principles of balance and steering geometry. The concept of "trail," where the point of contact between the tire and pavement is behind the steering pivot axis, plays a crucial role in self-correcting the bike's lean. The minimum speed for maintaining vertical stability is influenced by the amount of trail; more trail allows for stability at lower speeds. Additionally, while gyroscopic effects from the spinning wheels contribute to stability, they are less significant than the effects of trail in the steering geometry.
PREREQUISITESPhysics enthusiasts, bicycle designers, engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of bicycle stability and dynamics.
SteveDC said:A bike rolling down a hill will on average stay upright for longer than a free standing bike? I can't think of a way to explain why this is?
solar71 said:The wheels of a bicycle when spinning act as a gyro.
Probably the most important contribution to the understanding of bicycle physics is due to David Jones (Physics Today 23, April 1970) [1]. His first attempt to design an unridable bicycle by eliminating gyroscopic torques failed. Bicycles with tiny ball bearings instead of wheels proved to be perfectly ridable. Also compensating or even overcompensating gyroscopic torques by an additional dummy wheel turning in the opposite direction had no effect on rideability. His second attempt was successful. Bicycles which had a negative trail, i.e. a contact point K in front of the projection of the steering axis (see Fig. 1) were unridable. This demonstrated the importance of the steering geometry for bicycle riding.
CWatters said:That effect has been shown to be minimal or non-existent compared to the effect of trail in the steering geometry.