How do we parallel transport a vector?

pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
Given a curve c(τ) with tangent vector V, a vector field X is parallel transported along c if

\nabla_V X=0

at each point along c. Let x^\mu(\tau) denote the coordinates of the curve c. In components the parallel transport condition is

\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}\left(\partial_\mu X^\alpha + {\Gamma^\alpha}_{\mu\nu}X^\nu\right)=0

If we are given a vector X^\alpha(\tau_0) of the tangent space at c(\tau_0), how do we obtain the parallel transported vector X^\alpha(\tau) for finite \tau-\tau_0? Clearly it will be an integral taken along c but what is the form of that integral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rewrite your equation using the chain rule as

\frac{d X^\alpha}{d \tau} = -{\Gamma^\alpha}_{\mu\nu} \frac{d x^\mu}{d\tau} X^\nu(\tau)

This tells you how the components of the vector ##X## change if you parallel transport it along an infinitesimal increment in the affine parameter ##\tau##. You have to integrate up these changes to get the change when you change ##\tau## by a finite amount. Unfortunately the right hand side depends on ##X## so if you actually write down the integral you get an equation that only determines ##X^\alpha(\tau)## implicitly. It would be straightforward to do the integral numerically, though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Given a manifold ##M##, a derivative operator ##\nabla## on ##M##, a smooth curve ##\gamma: I\subseteq \mathbb{R} \rightarrow M## with tangent ##V##, and a tensor ##T_0## at some point ##\gamma(s_0)##, there exists a unique tensor field ##T## on ##\gamma## such that ##\nabla_{V}T = 0## and ##T(\gamma(s_0)) = T_0## i.e. ##T_0## is parallel transported along ##\gamma## with respect to ##\nabla##. This statement can be proven by choosing a set of local coordinates and invoking the uniqueness and existence theorem for ODEs.

To actually find ##T##, you just solve the ODE initial-value problem you get from the parallel transport condition (the initial value being ##T(\gamma(s_0)) = T_0##) by choosing a set of local coordinates. So for example in the case of a vector ##X##, you have ##\frac{dX^{\mu}}{ds} + \Gamma ^{\mu}_{\nu\gamma}V^{\nu}X^{\gamma} = 0 ##. This is an ODE that you can (in principle) solve.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
pellman, Please note that the way The Duck writes it:
\frac{d X^\alpha}{d \tau} = -{\Gamma^\alpha}_{\mu\nu} \frac{d x^\mu}{d\tau} X^\nu(\tau)
is the ONLY way to write the condition. What you wrote:
\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}\left(\partial_\mu X^\alpha + {\Gamma^\alpha}_{\mu\nu}X^\nu\right)=0
is a logical impossibility. Inside the parenthesis you have written ∂μXα as if Xα was a field, a function of four variables, so that you could take its four-dimensional gradient. It's only a function of one variable τ, and only defined along a single worldline.

You have to integrate up these changes to get the change when you change ##\tau## by a finite amount. Unfortunately the right hand side depends on ##X## so if you actually right down the integral you get an equation that only determines ##X^\alpha(\tau)## implicitly. It would be straightforward to do the integral numerically, though.
In other words, it's not an integral, it's a differential equation.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top