Does BICEP2 kill Conformal Cyclic Cosmology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter twistor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology Cyclic
twistor
Messages
74
Reaction score
8
Is CCC killed by BICEP2 or there is a way in which it survives?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Apparently it's still alive, because Roger doesn't believe in any of this newfangled inflation stuff. According to this interview with Ira Flatow:

http://www.sciencefriday.com/segment/04/04/2014/sir-roger-penrose-cosmic-inflation-is-fantasy.html

he attributes the B-mode observations, not to gravitational waves induced by quantum fluctuations during inflation, but to primordial magnetic fields left over from the pre-Big Bang.
 
Last edited:
Penrose's ideas about primordial B fields is a bit crazy and should be relatively straightforward to rule out. What's harder to do is to really remove all classical sources as a viable explanation. Indeed the Bicep signal could arise from cosmic strings or other early universe sources.

See eg
http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.0542

For an example.

The good news is many of these models are testable as the resolution is increased and are already in tension with some of the findings at large angular scales. Since inflation has a very strong posterior probability after so many tests and is much cleaner theoretically I do think it is the significant leader at this point.

All of this is still the early days and it is wise to exercise caution
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top