How can I think of rotational diffusion inverse seconds?

AI Thread Summary
Rotational diffusion describes the motion of particles, like rods, rotating in a fluid, quantified in inverse seconds (1/s). This concept can be visualized by considering the angular displacement of the particle's ends over time, akin to tracing a path on a sphere. For instance, a rotational diffusion coefficient (D_r) of 10 s^-1 indicates a certain angular movement compared to a higher value of 100 s^-1, which suggests faster rotation. The discussion emphasizes understanding rotational diffusion in terms of angular displacement rather than linear distance. Overall, visualizing this motion involves imagining the distance traced by the particle's ends on a sphere over a given time.
Steve Drake
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
When thinking of a spherical shaped particle moving about under Brownian motion, one describes its motion by Diffusion. The units being \frac{m^2}{s} I can understand this physically as a distance it will travel from a certain point in space averaged over x-y and z direction.
Now rotational diffusion on the other hand has units of inverse seconds \frac{1}{s} I cannot think of a way to visualize that? For e.g. a rod shaped particle, what does a
D_r = 10\, s^{-1} as opposed to say a D_r = 100\, s^{-1} mean? How can I visualize this like I can with a sphere moving an actual distance?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of rotational diffusion as having units radian2/s instead of 1/s.
 
Hi, Thanks

That makes a big more sense...

So in a geometrical sense... if a rod's center of mass with fixed in a liquid somehow, but it could still rotate around that point, does this mean the distance its ends would 'trace' out on a hypothetical sphere in 1 second would equal eg 40 radians?... I am still a bit confused thanks
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Velocity transformation between frames rotating relative to one another
Replies
1
Views
2K
I How can concentration gradient field come into existence immediately?
Replies
1
Views
3K
I Energy of spinning objects as axis of rotation moves
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Does a rotating accelerometer moving linearly measure linear velocity?
Replies
47
Views
4K
Observation about the rotation of a disc
Replies
4
Views
1K
Wheel moving in rotation and translation
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Can the Inverse Tan Function Justify Phase Lag in a Driven Harmonic Oscillator?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Do smells travel farther in colder or hotter temperatures?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Using a centrifuge to extract heavy water (help with the calculations please)
Replies
2
Views
3K
I The diffusion equation with time-dependent boundary condition
Replies
8
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top