Can Raising and Lowering Operators Be Found for an Anharmonic Oscillator?

hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
607
Let's say I have an anharmonic 1D oscillator that has the hamiltonian

##H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}kx^2+\lambda x^4##

or some other hamiltonian with higher than second-order terms in the potential energy. Is it possible, in general, to find raising and lowering operators for such a system? I mean operators that commute with the hamiltonian in such a way that they transform an eigenstate of ##H## into another eigenstate that has a higher or lower eigenvalue (of course the eigenvalues will not be evenly spaced in the anharmonic situation). I remember reading an article where someone solved the Morse oscillator system with some kind of generalized raising and lowering operators, but for some reason I can't access the full text anymore.

How would I go about constructing an example of an oscillator hamiltonian that is anharmonic and for which the creation and annihilation operators can be found?

EDIT: Yes, of course such operators exist for any quantum system, but usually they are not a simple function of the x and p operators.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the links.
 
Action-Angle Variables

There is an approximate way to get raising and lowering operators for an arbitrary potential that uses the heuristic of the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule. Unfortunately, it's only an approximation which is good in the semiclassical limit. I don't know how to systematically get better and better approximations.

The Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule is this:

First, using classical dynamics, you define the action variable J as follows:
J = \frac{1}{2 \pi}\int \sqrt{2m(E - V(x))} dx

This gives J as a function of E. If you invert this, to get E as a fuction of J, then you can define an angular frequency \omega via:

\omega = \dfrac{\partial E}{\partial J}

Finally, you create a new angle variable \theta to be just

\theta = \omega t

The pair \theta, J act as a generalized coordinate and corresponding momentum. In principle, you can figure out how to compute \theta, J from the usual coordinates x, p. The advantage to the \theta, J description is that the dynamics are particularly simple: the energy only depends on J, and so (by the hamilton equations of motion), the time dependence of \theta is trivial.

To relate this to quantum mechanics, Bohr and Sommerfeld proposed the quantization rule:

J = n \hbar

Since E can be computed from J, this gives you an indirect quantization of E.

The problem with this approach is that it's only an approximation. The rule J = n \hbar is only good in the limit where n \gg 1. For the harmonic oscillator, it gives E = n \hbar \omega rather than E = (n + 1/2) \hbar \omega

Anyway, action-angle variables gives a heuristic starting point for the raising and lowering operators a and a^\dagger:

a^\dagger = \sqrt{J} e^{i \theta}
a = e^{-i \theta} \sqrt{J}

Since J is the momentum canonical to \theta, we have the quantization rule [J, \theta] = -i \hbar. If |n\rangle is an eigenstate of J with eigenvalue n \hbar, then a^\dagger |n\rangle is an eigenstate with eigenvalue (n+1) \hbar.

So a^\dagger = \sqrt{J} e^{i \theta} and a = e^{-i \theta} \sqrt{J} a = e^{-i \theta} \sqrt{J} give starting points for raising and lowering operators for an arbitrary potential. However, knowing the classical forms of J and \theta as functions of p and x doesn't uniquely determine the quantum forms, because of operator ordering ambiguity (which can be thought of as the source of the 1/2 \hbar \omega error in the harmonic oscillator case).

Action-angle variables is a very rich subject in classical mechanics, although not a lot has been done with it in quantum mechanics, except in the old quantum theory.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top