Distance between equilibrium and nonequilibrium states

Billy Yang
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Recently, the properties of nonequilibrium many-body quantum systems have aroused great curiosity of physicists. Numerous papers have been published about this area. But how do we measure how far the system is from equilibrium states?

There are several proposals have been published, for example, using the heat which has been negated or using diagonal entropy. I am wondering whether using diagonal entropy to measure nonequilibrium has some flaws.

In thermodynamics, is there a measure to describe the distance between equilibrium and nonequilibrium?

Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for your response. After carefully viewing this paper, I found the hypothesis in this paper is interesting. Thanks again.
 
:-) Good papers. Do you think the term equilibrium for a quantum system is weird? In Rigol's paper, PRL, 98, 050405, the measure for a quantum system to reach equilibrium is whether the momentum distribution becomes averaged.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top