What is Schmidt's Rule and its Meaning?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joelle
  • Start date Start date
joelle
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'd like to know what the meaning of this expression : a crystal obeys schmidt's rule (in fact i don' t know what is the schmidt's rule)
If someone can help me i'll be grateful.
Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this is referring to Goldschmidt's Rule, which is an approximate rule of thumb telling you that substitutions that conserve oxidation state and ionic radius (approximately) introduce least strain in a crystal. This is something of an unwritten philosophy for a synthetic inorganic chemist or materials scientist. Pursuant to Goldschmidt's intuition was the excellent and extensive work done by Shannon and Prewitt on the influence of oxidation state on the ionic radius in a crystal. Shannon-Prewitt tables are a crystal-maker's Bible.

V. M. Goldschmidt was an early geochemist who contributed to the rise of crystallography and crystal chemistry in the mid-1920s.
 
Last edited:
... and Schmidt's law is one classical yield rule used in single crystals,

<br /> \left|s^{(k)}_{i}\sigma_{ij}n^{(k)}_{j}\right| =\tau_{0}<br />

where s^{(k)}_{i} are the components of the slip direction in the kth slip system, n^{(k)}_{j}is the slip plane normal and \sigma_{ij} the Cauchy stress tensor.
 
Now, I'm kinda sure that (Perennial's post) is what the OP wants. Ignore my previous post. Having had Goldschmidt sit in the back of my head for years made me think of his rule almost reflexively. Guess I should have Googled before posting to make sure there wasn't a Schmidt's Rule (I do not recall having seen it before).
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
157
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top