What is the lateral area of a pyramid with given side length and heights?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vitaly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Pyramid
AI Thread Summary
To find the lateral area of a pyramid with a side length of 300 ft and a perpendicular height of 321 ft, the slant height must first be calculated, which is determined to be 354 ft. The area of the lateral face is then computed using the formula for the area of a triangle, resulting in 53,100 square feet. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the slant height rather than the perpendicular height for this calculation. A recommended online calculator is also provided for further assistance. Understanding the distinction between slant height and perpendicular height is crucial for accurate area calculations.
vitaly
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
This problem is really getting to me, and I don't know why...

INfo: Pyramid, Side length = 300 ft, perpendicular height = 321 ft, and slant height = (work shown later)

1. Find the slant height. Round your answer to the nearest whole number.
(slant height)^2 = (height)^2 + (.5(side))^2
= (321)^2 + (150)^2
(slant height)^2 = 125,541
slant height = 354 feet.

Is that correct?

2. Use your previous answer to find the area of the lateral face.
(I'm not sure if I need to use height or slant height, but I used slant height, because when set straight, the slant height is perpendicular to the base. Please correct me if I'm wrong.)
area = .5(base)(height)
= .5(300)(354)
= 53, 100.

My main concern here is whether to use the slant height (354) or height (321) and why...

Thanks for all the help.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top