What are projects about nuclear controlled fusion reactor to achieve Q > 1

AI Thread Summary
Nuclear controlled fusion projects aim to achieve a Q factor greater than 1, with ITER targeting a Q of 10 for efficient power generation. ITER will utilize a hydrogen plasma torus at temperatures exceeding 100 million °C to produce 500 MW of fusion power. While thermonuclear bombs can achieve Q > 1, they lack the controlled conditions necessary for sustainable energy production. Previous experiments, such as those conducted on the JT-60, have reported gains around 1.25. These advancements highlight the ongoing research and development in fusion energy technology.
FEBAUSA
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
What are projects about nuclear controlled fusion reactor to achieve Q > 1, or possibly obtain Q > 1.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You have asked this in another thread, why are you making another thread?

I think a thermonuclear bomb would qualify as having Q greater than one, but that is not controlled as well as anyone would like.
 
The goal of ITER is to achieve a Q = 10, to have a high enough thermal efficiency for a power plant design.
 
I was wondering about that but I could not find the specific information until now.

It is based around a hydrogen plasma torus operating at over 100 million °C, and will produce 500 MW of fusion power.

http://www.iter.org/Parameters.htm
http://www.iter.org/plasmascenarios.htm

http://www.iter.org/reports.htm

Previous experiments page - http://www.iter.org/experiments.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's a few links about the performance of JT-60 if you're interested. I guess they were able to reach gains of 1.25 or thereabouts.

http://www.mext.go.jp/english/news/1998/06/980611.htm
http://www.jaeri.go.jp/english/press/980625-jt/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top