What are projects about nuclear controlled fusion reactor to achieve Q > 1

Click For Summary
Nuclear controlled fusion projects aim to achieve a Q factor greater than 1, with ITER targeting a Q of 10 for efficient power generation. ITER will utilize a hydrogen plasma torus at temperatures exceeding 100 million °C to produce 500 MW of fusion power. While thermonuclear bombs can achieve Q > 1, they lack the controlled conditions necessary for sustainable energy production. Previous experiments, such as those conducted on the JT-60, have reported gains around 1.25. These advancements highlight the ongoing research and development in fusion energy technology.
FEBAUSA
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
What are projects about nuclear controlled fusion reactor to achieve Q > 1, or possibly obtain Q > 1.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You have asked this in another thread, why are you making another thread?

I think a thermonuclear bomb would qualify as having Q greater than one, but that is not controlled as well as anyone would like.
 
The goal of ITER is to achieve a Q = 10, to have a high enough thermal efficiency for a power plant design.
 
I was wondering about that but I could not find the specific information until now.

It is based around a hydrogen plasma torus operating at over 100 million °C, and will produce 500 MW of fusion power.

http://www.iter.org/Parameters.htm
http://www.iter.org/plasmascenarios.htm

http://www.iter.org/reports.htm

Previous experiments page - http://www.iter.org/experiments.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's a few links about the performance of JT-60 if you're interested. I guess they were able to reach gains of 1.25 or thereabouts.

http://www.mext.go.jp/english/news/1998/06/980611.htm
http://www.jaeri.go.jp/english/press/980625-jt/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd like to start a discussion/debate of nuclear power for the purpose of informing people about it. I am participating in a thread in another forum http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=9370 where we are discussing an article about Germany planning to phase out nuclear power. I am STRONGLY against this. It is bad for scientific, economic, political, and environmental reasons. In the course of discussions of the nuclear power issue, it seems to me that the arguements...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
324
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
399
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K