Lingusitics Should the world have a single language?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Language
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential benefits of a common language in fostering understanding among global factions. While some argue that a shared language could enhance communication and psychological connections, others contend that conflicts arise from well-understood interests rather than misunderstandings. The conversation also touches on the peculiarities of English spelling, suggesting that its diverse linguistic roots contribute to its complexity. Historical examples, such as the American Revolution and the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq, illustrate that a common language has not always prevented conflict, highlighting that language alone may not resolve deeper issues.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
would a common language bring better understanding
between various factions around the world?
why did esperanto die out?
why do we stick with crazy ways for spelling,
like, knob,vacuum,phantom why not
nob,vakume,fantom?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The Spanish had a great world empire. Then they rationalized their spelling at look what happened!
 
Originally posted by wolram

why do we stick with crazy ways for spelling,
like, knob,vacuum,phantom why not
nob,vakume,fantom?

why not nob, vakyem, fantem?
ynotnobvakyemfantem
 
Originally posted by wolram
would a common language bring better understanding
between various factions around the world?
Not one bit. It is not misunderstanding but well understood conflict of interests that causes problems.
 
Ya. My mother and I misunderstand each other all the time.
 
Although it would not be enough in itself, I think a common language would certainly help. Not only from the communication aspect, but also the psychology of language.

English is about as close to a universal language as we have at present, because it is entirely composed of bits and pieces of other languages. This also explains why some of the spellings seem so odd; that's the way the word was spelled before it was "appropriated" by English.
 
Originally posted by LURCH
Although it would not be enough in itself, I think a common language would certainly help.
I don't really see how it would help one bit based on how it didn't help one bit in the past. If you take English, the fact everyone involved spoke English did nothing to prevent the American Revolution. Likewise it did nothing to prevent the American Civil War.

Iraq invaded Kuwait a few years back despite their both being Arabic speaking countries, and the first country Germany invaded under the Nazis was German speaking Austria.
 
Back
Top