Projectile Motion baseball hit question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a baseball hit by a player, which must clear a wall of a specific height and distance. Participants are tasked with determining the initial velocity of the ball, the time it takes to reach the wall, and its velocity components upon reaching the wall.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of kinematic equations and the significance of the initial angle of projection. There are attempts to derive the initial velocity using given parameters, but uncertainty exists regarding the final velocity at the wall and the interpretation of the equations provided.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the equations needed to solve the problem, while others express confusion about the relationship between the variables and the application of the formulas. There is an ongoing exploration of how to approach the problem using the provided equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of having two unknowns (initial velocity and time) in the equations derived from the problem setup, which raises questions about how to solve for both variables simultaneously. There is also discussion about the origin of specific numerical values used in the equations.

pulau_tiga
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
can you please help me with this question. I really am stumped, on how to get the initial velocity.

A ball player hits a home run and the baseball just clears a wall 21.0 m high located 130 m from home plate. (assume max height of the ball is 21.0 m) The ball is hit at an angel of 35.0* to the horizontal at a height of 1.0 m.
a) What is the initial velocity of the ball?
b) how much time does it take the ball to reach the wall?
c) Find the veolicty components and the velocity of the ball when it reaches the wall.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi pulau_tiga!

Welcome to the forums!

Can you post what you've tried so far, even if it's just looking up the relevant formulas?

You won't learn it if we do the problem for you.
 
Okay.
I know that a=-9.8 m/s; and d= 20.m
but I don't know if Vf = 0... I think it might, but I'm not sure.
If it does = 0 then I think I can do...
Vf2 = Vi2 +2ad
0 = Vi2 +2ad
-2ad = Vi2
-2(-9.8)(20.) = Vi2
390 m2/s2 = Vi2
Vi=20. m/s
but I don't know if Vf = 0 or not.
my answer seems reasonable, so that seems possible to me.
 
No, it is not necessary that vf be 0. If we assume that the ball is at its highest point when it passes the wall that would be true but you can't assume that. By the way, did you use the fact that the initial angle is 35 degrees?

Unfortunately, I don't know what formulas you have available to use.

Here's how I would do the problem.

Calling the initial speed v0, we know that the initial "velocity vector" was (v0 cos(35), v0 sin(35))- that is, that the initial horizontal speed was v0 cos(35) and the initial vertical speed was v0 sin(35). We also know that the horizontal acceleration is 0 and that the vertical acceleration is -9.81 m/s^2.

From that, we can get that the horizontal speed at any time, t seconds, is v0 cos(35) (no acceleration so it doesn't change) and that the vertical speed at time t is vo sin(35)- 9.81t.

From that, we can get that the horizontal position at any time, t seconds, is vo cos(35)t and that the vertical position at time t is
1+ vo sin(35)t- 4.9 t^2 (That "1" is the initial height).

Since the wall is 130 m horizontally and 21 m high, and the ball "just cleared" the fence, at that time we must have
v0 cos(35)t= 130 and 1+ v0 sin(35)t- 4.9t^2= 21.

You can solve those two equations for v0 and t.
 
Hello, I am having trouble with this same exact question.
I read this topic fully and I do not get it.
The person gave two equations having two unkown variables, initial velocity and time in order to find time and initial velocity. How is this possible?
Can someone explain this in...eh...easier terms?
:rolleyes:

Thanks,
Brandon
 
Also...where did the 4.9 come from in that one equation... :confused:
 
Brando05 said:
Also...where did the 4.9 come from in that one equation... :confused:

OK, so 4.9 is half of 9.81... :approve:
 
hehehe, that was a dozy 9.8/2=4.9. Whew. :-p
jk
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
5K