1/f differentiation- why am I not getting it

  • Thread starter Thread starter asif zaidi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of the function 1/f, where f is a differentiable function at a point x and f(x) is non-zero. The original poster seeks clarification on the derivation of the derivative of 1/f, specifically the appearance of the f'(x) term in the expression for the derivative.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the chain rule in differentiation and explore the limits involved in deriving the expression for the derivative of 1/f. Some participants question the original poster's approach to differentiation and suggest alternative methods for understanding the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the differentiation process. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of the chain rule and the need to differentiate with respect to x rather than f. Multiple interpretations of the differentiation process are being explored.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has reiterated the problem statement, indicating a potential misunderstanding in the differentiation process. There is a focus on ensuring clarity in the application of differentiation rules.

asif zaidi
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
What am I missing here


Problem Statement:

Let f be a differentiable at point x and assume f(x) is not equal to 0. Show that function 1/f is differentiable at x=0 and (1/f)' = -f'(x)/( f(x) ^2 )

Solution
1/f = f^-1.
So taking its derivative I get the following: -f^-2. But I fail to see where the f'(x) term comes from. Plz advise.


Thanks

Asif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to apply the chain rule when you take the derivative:

If u is a function of x, then if you take the derivative of some function g(u) with respect to x,

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}g(u) = \frac{dg}{du}\frac{du}{dx}[/tex]

In this case, g(u) is your function 1/u, and u = f(x). Does this make sense?
 
Well, you could do it directly like this:
[tex]\lim_{h\to{0}}\frac{\frac{1}{f(x+h)}-\frac{1}{f(x)}}{h}=\lim_{h\to{0}}\frac{f(x)-f(x+h)}{hf(x+h)f(x)}=-\lim_{h\to{0}}(\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h})*\frac{1}{f(x+h)f(x)}[/tex]
See if you manage to get something out of this.
 
asif zaidi said:
What am I missing here


Problem Statement:

Let f be a differentiable at point x and assume f(x) is not equal to 0. Show that function 1/f is differentiable at x=0 and (1/f)' = -f'(x)/( f(x) ^2 )

Solution
1/f = f^-1.
So taking its derivative I get the following: -f^-2. But I fail to see where the f'(x) term comes from. Plz advise.


Thanks

Asif
Because you differentiated with respect to f, rather than with respect to x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K