1 maximal subgroup -> prime order

[boboYO]

'Prove that if a finite group G has only one maximal subgroup M, then |G| is the power of a prime'


I've somehow deduced that no finite group has only one maximal subgroup, and I'm having trouble seeing where I went wrong.
This is what I have:

Let $$H_1$$ be a subgroup of G. Either $$H_1$$ is maximal and equal to M or it is not maximal and there is a $$H_2$$ such that $$H_1<H_2<G$$ (using < to mean proper subgroup). Apply the same argument to $$H_2$$ and we get an ascending chain of subgroups. Since G is finite the process must end eventually (when we reach M).

Thus every subgroup of G is a subgroup of M and hence every element of G is an element of M, and G=M, a contradiction.

So would someone like to point out the flaw in the above reasoning? thanks.

 

[Hurkyl]

So would someone like to point out the flaw in the above reasoning? thanks.

Try substituting for G a particular group where the conclusion is obviously wrong. Do you know any groups with only one maximal subgroup?








The most obvious ones to me to try are the two-element group, or maybe the cyclic group on 4 elements.

 

[boboYO]

Thanks Hurkyl. That should've been the first thing to do. For anyone interested, the problem is with the last sentence. It does not follow that every element of G is an element of M: the elements of G that generate G do not have to be in M.

 

[Borvorn]

I know that this post is old, but since it is top result when i google this problem, I think it would be good if i give further detail of solution.

Let $a \in G \setminus M$. Then $a$ generate $G$ which mean $G$ is cyclic. Suppose $|G| = p_{1}^{r_{1}}...p_{n}^{r_{n}}$ where $p_{i}$ is prime. So $a^{p_{i}}$ and $a^{p_{j}}$ generated a different maximal subgroup which is contradiction.