1d diffusion equation solution for slab with non symmetric source

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the one-dimensional diffusion equation for a slab with a non-symmetric source distribution. The user has derived both homogeneous and particular solutions but struggles with boundary conditions, specifically setting neutron flux to zero at the slab's edges. They consider using the average source to simplify the problem but are uncertain about its effectiveness. A suggestion is made to explore Green's functions and their convolution with the source term as a potential solution method. The conversation highlights the complexity of applying boundary conditions in diffusion problems and the importance of finding a physically realizable solution.
Mojo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no HH Template is shown.
Disclaimer: This is a homework problem

I need to analytically solve the diffusion equation for a 1d 1 group slab with width a, and source distribution Se^(-k(x+a/2))

I've gone through the math, and come up with my homogeneous and particular solution and attempted to apply the boundary conditions of the flux set to 0 at -a/2 and a/2 but my constants are functions of each other. I was thinking of solving the source for the average, and setting the neutron current at that point to 0 but I didn't think that would work. Is there any other boundary condition I can use? I read in another text (I went through about 4 texts and 7 power points to no avail) "There always exists a physically realizable solution (no critical buckling!)") (http://www.mit.edu/~lululi/school/22.211_Nuclear_Reactor_Physics_I/notes/__all__.pdf) But I am not sure how to use this condition, or if it applies to this problem. I would greatly appreciate any insight into this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you haven't tried it already, I would try finding a Green's function and taking it's convolution with the source term.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K