I 1D Heat Transfer Analytical Wall

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a transient heat transfer problem in a steel wall with specific thermal properties. The user encounters unexpected results when increasing time, leading to a reduction in temperature in the unexposed wall, contrary to expectations. A proposed solution involves using a lumped parameter model, suggesting that the temperature profile can be treated as uniform due to the short time scale for temperature flattening compared to thermal inertia. The derived temperature equation indicates that at 360 seconds, the wall temperature should be approximately 46°C. Clarifications on the units of specific heat (Cp) and a request for a diagram are also noted.
kartini99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Problem finding the correct temperature value for unexposed heat by using separation variables.
Hello everyone,

I'm trying to solve the transient heat transfer problem within the ID wall.
The material is steel, and it is isotropic.
The properties are given below :
L = 5 mm
qin = 0
Tinf = 100 deg C
Tini = 20 deg C
rho = 7850 kg/m3
cp = 460 W/Kg.K
k = 45.8 W/m.K
h = 20 W/m^2.K
alpha = k / rho*cp
t = 360 second
Fo = alpha * t / (L**2)

By using the attached formulation, I got the root of the function lambda is 0.03303492.
However, I increased the time, and the temperature in the unexposed wall was reduced. and when I change the time to 1 (one), the value shows almost like the T imposed, which is 100. Kind of the opposite way, Kindly any body help me with that. I also attached the script below

Python:
from scipy.optimize import fsolve
import numpy as np

def xtanxmbi(x, Bi):
    # tan = np.tan(x*np.pi/180)
    # return np.arctan(tan)*Bi-x
    # return (1/np.tan(x))*Bi-x
    return (np.cos(x)/np.sin(x))*Bi-x

# W = 1
# H = 0.1
L = 2.5 / 1000
qin = 0
Tinf = 100
Tini = 20
rhocp = 7850 * 460
k = 45.8
h = 20
alpha = k / rhocp
t = 360
Fo = alpha * t / (L**2)
print(f"The Fo is = {Fo}")
N = 6
n = 6
Bi = h * L / k
theta = np.zeros((n, N))
x0 = np.arange(n) * np.pi + 0.3
ans = fsolve(xtanxmbi, x0=x0, args=(Bi), full_output=True)
if ans[2] != 1:
    print("error solving roots of transcendental equation")
roots = ans[0]
Bi5 = Bi
print(f"Bi = {Bi5} , {roots}")

for i in np.arange(n):
    An = 2* np.sin(roots[I]) / (roots[I]+np.sin(roots[I])*np.cos(roots[I]))
    print(f"An = {An}")
    x = 1
    theta[I] = An * np.exp((-roots[I] ** 2 )* Fo) * np.cos(roots[I] * x)
    print(f"value of theta = {theta}")
    print(type(theta))
# Cn_0 = 4.0 * np.sin(roots[0]) / (2.0 * roots[0] + np.sin(2.0 * roots[0]))
# print(f"value of Cn is ={Cn_0}")
# theta_0 = Cn_0 * np.exp(-roots[0] ** 2 * Fo) * np.cos(roots[0] * x)
# print(f"value of theta is ={theta_0}")
sum_theta = theta[0, 0]
# print(sum_theta)

T = Tini + (Tinf - Tini) * sum_theta
print(f"value T={T}")
[/I][/I][/I][/I][/I][/I][/I]
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    52.7 KB · Views: 146
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Please provide a diagram.
 
The units of Cp are incorrect
 
As an engineer, my approach to this is entirely different, and I actually get a simple accurate answer. Looking at the time scale for flattening of the temperature within the wall ##L^2/\alpha##, I conclude that this time scale is only a few seconds, compared to the time scale for the thermal inertia of the wall to respond to the outside heat transfer ##\tau = \rho C_p L/h##, which is on the order of 900 sec. So it is valid to use an lumped parameter model for the slab, with the temperature profile within the slab treated as uniform. For this description, the temperature is a function only of time, given by $$T=100-(100-20)e^{-t/\tau}$$At 360 seconds, this gives a temperature of about 46 C.
 
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
405
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K