(2/3) as constant factor In Kinetic theory of gases

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the constant factor of 2/3 in the kinetic theory of gases, specifically in the formula for pressure, p = (2/3)(N/V)Ek, where p is pressure, N is the number of molecules, V is the volume, and Ek is the average kinetic energy. Participants confirm that the 2/3 factor arises from statistical mechanics, reflecting the three-dimensional nature of molecular motion. The derivation involves understanding momentum change during elastic collisions with container walls, leading to the conclusion that the average kinetic energy contributes to the pressure exerted by the gas. This foundational concept is essential for further studies in physics and chemistry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, including pressure and kinetic energy.
  • Familiarity with statistical mechanics and its application in physical systems.
  • Knowledge of momentum and elastic collisions in physics.
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations and understanding variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the ideal gas law and its relationship to kinetic theory.
  • Learn about statistical mechanics and its implications in thermodynamics.
  • Explore the concept of elastic and inelastic collisions in greater detail.
  • Investigate the role of dimensional analysis in physical equations.
USEFUL FOR

High school students preparing for college-level physics, educators teaching kinetic theory, and anyone interested in the statistical foundations of gas behavior.

TheColector
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi
I'm in high school but what I'm going to ask you is probably being teached in college.
General formula: p=(2/3)*(N/V)*Ek
p- pressure
N- amount of molecules
V- volume of the container
Ek - AVERAGE kinetic energy

I've been told by my physics teacher, that 2/3 constant factor in kinetic theory of gases is the result of using mathematical statistics. As there're lots of molecules moving all the time with high velocity and different directions, kinetic energy of each is different. Therefore we use AVERAGE kinetic energy of molecules. In order to calculate this average Ek we use mathematical statistics(which with I'm not acquired at all). All of this seems logical to me. Can you possibly tell me if all of this is correct ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
your expression is a version of the equation for the pressure of a gas derived from kinetic theory
P = 1/3(Nmc2)/V where N = number of molecules, m is the mass of 1 molecule and c is the average (rms) velocity of a molecule and V is the volume
this can be written 2/3 N/V(mc2/2)
or P = {2/3N/V} x(average KE of molecule)
 
The 3 comes from the fact that we are in 3 dimensions.
You can get the flavour of it by considering a cubic box, and a molecule bouncing back and forth along one axis.
Each time it hits a wall it imparts an impulse 2mv (do you see why?)
If the length of the box is L then it hits that wall each period of time 2L/v. So the average force on that wall from that molecule is mv2/L.
Of course, the molecules are bouncing around in all directions, but it turns out that you get the right result if you just consider the three axes of the box, i.e. take it as though a third are bouncing along each axis.
 
I see now. That's pretty clever way of thinking about it. What does the "2mv" stand for ?
 
TheColector said:
I see now. That's pretty clever way of thinking about it. What does the "2mv" stand for ?
Mass x velocity = momentum. If it hits with velocity v, head on, and bounces back with velocity v, the net change in momentum is m(v-(-v))=2mv.
 
TheColector said:
I see now. That's pretty clever way of thinking about it. What does the "2mv" stand for ?
2mc is the change in momentum due to an elastic collision of a molecule with the walls...rate of change of momentum = force on wall. ie number of collisions per second x 2mc = force
You have mc2 in the expression so it is 'nice' to have 2 x 1/2mc2 so that 1/2mc2 appears as average KE...this is where the 2 in the top line comes from...good stuff
 
I totallly forgot about the fact that all the collisions are elastic. Thanks for enlightening me.
 
You will probably see all this again if you take a physics or chemistry course in college. As you can see by the posts above, analyzing physical systems using simple models can be fascinating and successful and fun. This is the best advertising for these college courses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K