(2/3) as constant factor In Kinetic theory of gases

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the constant factor of 2/3 in the kinetic theory of gases, specifically its role in the formula relating pressure, number of molecules, volume, and average kinetic energy. Participants explore the mathematical and conceptual foundations of this relationship, touching on topics relevant to both high school and college-level physics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the formula p=(2/3)*(N/V)*Ek and seeks validation of its correctness, linking the 2/3 factor to the use of mathematical statistics in averaging kinetic energy.
  • Another participant provides an alternative expression for pressure derived from kinetic theory, emphasizing the relationship between pressure, number of molecules, mass, and average velocity.
  • A participant explains that the factor of 3 arises from the three-dimensional nature of molecular motion, using a cubic box as an illustrative example.
  • There is a discussion about the meaning of "2mv" in the context of momentum change during elastic collisions with the walls of the container.
  • Participants clarify that the change in momentum during collisions contributes to the force exerted on the walls, linking it back to the average kinetic energy in the pressure formula.
  • One participant acknowledges the importance of elastic collisions in this context, indicating a deeper understanding of the topic.
  • A later reply suggests that the concepts discussed will be revisited in future college courses, highlighting the engaging nature of analyzing physical systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints and clarifications regarding the derivation and implications of the 2/3 factor, but no consensus is reached on the overall interpretation or implications of the kinetic theory as discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the ideal gas behavior and the nature of molecular collisions are implicit in the discussion, but these are not explicitly stated or resolved.

TheColector
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi
I'm in high school but what I'm going to ask you is probably being teached in college.
General formula: p=(2/3)*(N/V)*Ek
p- pressure
N- amount of molecules
V- volume of the container
Ek - AVERAGE kinetic energy

I've been told by my physics teacher, that 2/3 constant factor in kinetic theory of gases is the result of using mathematical statistics. As there're lots of molecules moving all the time with high velocity and different directions, kinetic energy of each is different. Therefore we use AVERAGE kinetic energy of molecules. In order to calculate this average Ek we use mathematical statistics(which with I'm not acquired at all). All of this seems logical to me. Can you possibly tell me if all of this is correct ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
your expression is a version of the equation for the pressure of a gas derived from kinetic theory
P = 1/3(Nmc2)/V where N = number of molecules, m is the mass of 1 molecule and c is the average (rms) velocity of a molecule and V is the volume
this can be written 2/3 N/V(mc2/2)
or P = {2/3N/V} x(average KE of molecule)
 
The 3 comes from the fact that we are in 3 dimensions.
You can get the flavour of it by considering a cubic box, and a molecule bouncing back and forth along one axis.
Each time it hits a wall it imparts an impulse 2mv (do you see why?)
If the length of the box is L then it hits that wall each period of time 2L/v. So the average force on that wall from that molecule is mv2/L.
Of course, the molecules are bouncing around in all directions, but it turns out that you get the right result if you just consider the three axes of the box, i.e. take it as though a third are bouncing along each axis.
 
I see now. That's pretty clever way of thinking about it. What does the "2mv" stand for ?
 
TheColector said:
I see now. That's pretty clever way of thinking about it. What does the "2mv" stand for ?
Mass x velocity = momentum. If it hits with velocity v, head on, and bounces back with velocity v, the net change in momentum is m(v-(-v))=2mv.
 
TheColector said:
I see now. That's pretty clever way of thinking about it. What does the "2mv" stand for ?
2mc is the change in momentum due to an elastic collision of a molecule with the walls...rate of change of momentum = force on wall. ie number of collisions per second x 2mc = force
You have mc2 in the expression so it is 'nice' to have 2 x 1/2mc2 so that 1/2mc2 appears as average KE...this is where the 2 in the top line comes from...good stuff
 
I totallly forgot about the fact that all the collisions are elastic. Thanks for enlightening me.
 
You will probably see all this again if you take a physics or chemistry course in college. As you can see by the posts above, analyzing physical systems using simple models can be fascinating and successful and fun. This is the best advertising for these college courses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K