2 charged conductors form a capacitor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of two charged conductors when connected to a battery, specifically focusing on the charge distribution on the surfaces of the conductors, which are treated as an ideal parallel plate capacitor. Participants explore the implications of initial charges, the role of the battery, and the geometry of the conductors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the initial charges Q1 and Q2 have opposite signs, suggesting that they might have the same or opposite signs.
  • There is a discussion about whether the final charge distribution differs from a scenario where the plates start with no initial charge, with some arguing that the battery maintains a constant potential difference by adding or removing charges as needed.
  • One participant asserts that if the plates are infinitely large, they would hold an infinite charge at any voltage, prompting a need for clarification of the problem's specifications.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the charges Q1 and Q2 are amounts of charge, not charge density, and questions the implications of ideal wires having zero resistance on charge distribution.
  • Concerns are raised about the outward-facing surfaces of the plates potentially holding charges, with some arguing that they should not due to the ideal wires.
  • There is a clarification that the plates cannot be mathematically infinite, as this would imply a potential difference at infinity, but they can be considered "physically" infinite in the context of the problem.
  • One participant mentions that any net excess charge would be distributed on the outside surfaces of the entire circuit, depending on geometry.
  • Another participant questions the conservation of total charge if the inward surfaces hold no charge, leading to further debate on charge distribution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the charge distribution on the surfaces of the conductors and the implications of the battery's role. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on several key points.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of "infinite" and "ideal," as well as the unresolved implications of the geometry on charge distribution. The discussion also highlights the need for clarification on the initial conditions and assumptions regarding the system.

feynman1
Messages
435
Reaction score
29
2 separate big conductors initially charged Q1 and Q2. Then connect them in a circuit with a battery of emf V. The charges Q1 and Q2 will go to the 4 surfaces (marked red). All the 4 surfaces have an area A. Suppose the 2 conductors form an ideal parallel plate capacitor and the wires in the circuit have no resistance. How to determine the charges on the 4 red surfaces?
1611832524088.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
feynman1 said:
Faculty looking for tips of designing PhD studentship interviews.
Is this the same user ?

Re this thread: do Q1 and Q2 have opposite signs ?
 
  • Informative
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Vanadium 50
What makes you think that the final charge distribution is any different from what you get if you connect the two plates to the battery when there is no initial charge on them? Remember, the job of the battery is to maintain a constant potential difference V across its terminals. It will do just that in either case by adding/removing charges from the plates as needed.
 
BvU said:
Is this the same user ?

Re this thread: do Q1 and Q2 have opposite signs ?
Q1 and Q2 might have the same or opposite signs
 
There will be a net charge of Q1+Q2 distrbuted on the entire circuit and a charge Q=±VC separated on the capacitor plates where C is the Capacitance of the plates.
The details depend upon the exact geometry. To determine it you solve (or approximately solve) Maxwell's equations. Is there a point to this?
 
hutchphd said:
There will be a net charge of Q1+Q2 distrbuted on the entire circuit and a charge Q=±VC separated on the capacitor plates where C is the Capacitance of the plates.
The details depend upon the exact geometry. To determine it you solve (or approximately solve) Maxwell's equations. Is there a point to this?
The plates are infinitely large. Let's care about the 4 red surfaces only. The geometry is already idealized, so we don't want to solve maxwell.
 
If the plates are infinitely large,they will hold an infinite charge at any voltage . I think you need to specify your problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
hutchphd said:
If the plates are infinitely large,they will hold an infinite charge at any voltage . I think you need to specify your problem.
Q1 and Q2 are amounts of charge, not density.
 
To maintain V the battery will need to supply infinite charge ±∞. Doesn't matter otherwise.
 
  • #10
kuruman said:
What makes you think that the final charge distribution is any different from what you get if you connect the two plates to the battery when there is no initial charge on them? Remember, the job of the battery is to maintain a constant potential difference V across its terminals. It will do just that in either case by adding/removing charges from the plates as needed.
The 2 outward facing sufaces will hold charges? But they should disappear due to the ideal wires (resistance=0)?
 
  • #11
Are your capacitors infinite??You need to specify the problem.
 
  • #12
feynman1 said:
The 2 outward facing sufaces will hold charges? But they should disappear due to the ideal wires (resistance=0)?
I never said or implied that the two outward surfaces hold charges. Furthermore the resistance of the wires has nothing to do with this. Once the battery is connected and the charges are redistributed, the left plate and the wire connected to it all the way to the positive terminal of the battery is an equipotential. Similarly, the right plate and wire is an equipotential.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
  • #13
hutchphd said:
Are your capacitors infinite??You need to specify the problem.
The plates cannot be mathematically infinite else there will be a potential difference between two points at infinity. They are "physically" infinite in the sense that the measure for their size (radius if circular, sides if rectangular) is much larger than the separation between them. In this limit the electric field between the plates can be considered uniform without fringing at the ends. That's the ideal parallel plate capacitor that OP specified in post #1.
 
  • #14
And the whole circuit could carry an arbitrary additional charge from say an ungrounded lab tech. It would be distributed all over the place. Of course the capacitor cannot be infinite..but you are correct he did specify "ideal" in the beginning and switched to infinite later.
The ideal air capacitor will carry surface charge densitie$$\sigma =\pm\epsilon_0\frac V {separation}$$ on the opposing faces.

..
 
  • #15
kuruman said:
I never said or implied that the two outward surfaces hold charges. Furthermore the resistance of the wires has nothing to do with this. Once the battery is connected and the charges are redistributed, the left plate and the wire connected to it all the way to the positive terminal of the battery is an equipotential. Similarly, the right plate and wire is an equipotential.
So the 2 outward surfaces hold no charge? Then the total charge on the 2 inward surfaces=0, total charge isn't conserved any more (initially Q1+Q2)?
 
  • #16
No.
Any net excess charge will be distributed on the outside surfaces of the entire circuit depending on geometry as I mentioned previously.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
9K