2-D kinematics/Forces (weight up an incline)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ubbaken
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving 2-D kinematics and forces, specifically analyzing the forces acting on a chesterfield being pushed up a frictionless ramp inclined at 26.9°.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the weight of the chesterfield and the forces acting on it, questioning how to resolve these forces into components parallel and perpendicular to the ramp.
  • Some participants suggest using trigonometric relationships to find the normal force and the pushing force, while others emphasize the importance of considering equilibrium conditions due to the constant speed of the chesterfield.
  • There are discussions about the interpretation of the problem and the correct application of angles in calculations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing various insights and approaches to the problem. Some have offered guidance on how to set up the coordinate system and resolve forces, while others are still grappling with the correct calculations and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of ambiguity in the problem statement, and participants are working through assumptions related to the forces involved and their components. The discussion reflects a mix of correct and incorrect reasoning as participants refine their understanding.

ubbaken
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The Question:
A 123 kg chesterfield is pushed up a frictionless ramp at a constant speed by a delivery person.
If the ramp is inclined at 26.9° to the horizontal, what horizontal force must the delivery person apply to the chesterfield?

http://capa.physics.mcmaster.ca/figures/hr/Graph05/hr-pic0563.png

The way I am thinking about the problem is that the answer should be the horizonal component of the F(g) (weight) of the chesterfield (C). Since balancing that force would produce a net force of 0 in the horizontal dimension.

Drawing it out, the y' of w is wcosθ and x' is wsinθ. So the horizonal component would be (wsinθ)cosθ. The number I get for that is 486.85N (using g=9.81). This is apparently incorrect.

So my question is: How am I supposed to think about this problem? What am I doing wrong? Also, the question seems a little ambiguous also, but how would any of you interpret it?

Thank you for your time and consideration.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
To find the magnitude normal force use the following equation:
Fg = Fn cos0 (because the chesterfield is on a tilt)
Fn = Fg/cos0

Then I found the magnitude of the normal force in the X direction. That should be the force of the push.
 
Stop thinking in terms of x an y axes. Rotate you axes so that they are parallel and perpendicular to the surface. You now have to find the components of weight and the applied force that are "parallel" and "perpendicular."

Note: the normal force will balance all components perpendicular to the
surface. So all that is left are the components of applied force and weight parallel to surface.
 
Sorry, my x' was 'parallel' to the ramp and y' was perpendicular.

What I have are:
F(normal)=wcosθ and

F(push)=wsinθ=(123kg)(9.81m/s/s)sin(26.9deg)=546N

But that is incorrect...
 
ubbaken said:
Sorry, my x' was 'parallel' to the ramp and y' was perpendicular.

What I have are:
F(normal)=wcosθ and

F(push)=wsinθ=(123kg)(9.81m/s/s)sin(26.9deg)=546N

But that is incorrect...

Constant velocity implies equilibrium. So, the sum of the three forces, the normal force N (reaction from the ground to the chair), the weight of the chair W and the pushing force F, has to vanish, i.e. [tex]\vec{N}+\vec{W}+\vec{F}=\vec{0}[/tex]. So, what applies to vectors, applies to their components, too. Place a coordinate system and off you go.
 
ubbaken said:
F(push)=wsin?=(123kg)(9.81m/s/s)sin(26.9deg)=546N
Since the pushing force is not paralle to the surface, then only the parallel componant of the push will be 546 N. What is the full magnitude of the push if this is one of the componants?
 
Chi Meson said:
Since the pushing force is not paralle to the surface, then only the parallel componant of the push will be 546 N. What is the full magnitude of the push if this is one of the componants?

That was my first post, I believe.
 
ubbaken said:
That was my first post, I believe.
If 545.9 N is a componant of hte pushing force, then the pushing force itself must be a larger magnitude. Go back and examine what you did with the cos theta.

The answer is 612 N
 
ah yes, I see now.

I was making some incorrect equalities with my angles.

Thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K