(-2)^some decimal = a + bi? why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matt Jacques
  • Start date Start date
Matt Jacques
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
(-2)^some decimal = a + bi? why?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What does 3^2 mean? It's 3*3. We then manipulate things algebraically and see it makes sense to define, for positive x, x^r for r 1/n for some integer n as the n'th root. We also see that x^{-r} = 1/x^r for r any integer, moreover we see we can define any rational power in this way - the power p/q is the qth root of the pth power. all well and good, but that doesn't allow us to *define* powers of negative numbers always, and have the power be not a rational number. So we add on the symbol i, so that (-1)^{1/2}:=i (that := means defined to be equal to). Adding in imaginary numbers allows us to define powers of negative numbers. Is that a sufficient start, I mean, is it puzzling to you why (-1)^{0.5} is of the form a+ib?


Do you need to know how to define the powers for irrationnal exponent?

properly, x^r := exp(r*log(x))

so it boils down to knowing exp of anything is just a power series in the anything, and defining log for arbitrary complex numbers, which can be done.
 
Last edited:
Egads! I can't believe I didn't see that..blame it on my lack of sleep. Now let's pretend I never asked it.

Thanks for the great explanation though!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top