2010 Euclid Contest Discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Canada_Whiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contest Discussion
AI Thread Summary
The 2010 Euclid Contest sparked discussions about the difficulty of specific problems, particularly question #10 regarding the number of triangles with integer side lengths and perimeter. Participants expressed challenges with proving T(2m) = T(2m-3) and determining the smallest n such that T(n) > 2010. Problem #9 also generated debate, especially the proof involving angle relationships in triangle ABC. Some users shared their partial solutions and insights, while others sought help for specific parts of the problems. Overall, the contest prompted a collaborative effort to tackle complex mathematical concepts.
Canada_Whiz
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
As you might know, the 2010 Euclid Contest was officially taken yesterday. So let's discuss!

I thought it wasnt too bad. #10 was hard though (the triangle one). Here was the question:

For each positive integer n, let T(n) be the number of triangles with integer side lengths, positive area, and perimeter n. For example, T(6) = 1 since only such triangle with a perimeter of 6 has side lengths 2, 2 and 2.
(b) If m is a positive integer with m >=(greater than or equal to) 3, prove that T(2m) = T(2m-3).
(c) Determine the smallest positive integer n such that T(n) > 2010.

Also, #9 was hard:

(b) In triangle ABC, BC = a, AC = b, AB = c, and a < .5(b+c).
Prove that angle BAC < .5 (angle ABC + angle ACB).

Can you please help me with those problems?

Also, if anyone wants to share how they solved #7 and 8, that would be appreciated :)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2010 Euclid Contest , very easy. just 10(b)(c) i cannot do it.

9(b):
use this formula:A/SINA=B/SINB=C/SINC

7A:too easy .cannot remember the answer
7B:i just remenbered there are 2 points.
8A:cannot remember
8b:110
9A(i):too easy
9A(ii):120
 
oh ****. 9A(ii)should be 4. i misunderstand the queston.
but anyway, i can get at least 80:)
 
Does the fact that {\sin}BAC&lt;\frac{1}{2}({\sin}ABC+{\sin}BCA) imply the desired result in problem 9b?
 
have you not got the answer 9(B)? very very easy!

here is my answer:
A/SINA=B/SINB=C/SINC
so 2SINA<SINB+SINC

because this is permanent.
we know SINB+SINC is bigger or equal 2(root SINB*SINC) only when SINB=SINC , it can be equal.
so 2SINA<2(root SINB*SINC)
SINCE SINB=SINC
2SINA<2SINB=2SINC
SINA<SINB=SINC
SINCE A+B+C=180
SO WHEN SINA=SINB=SINC,A=B=C=60, THEN A MUST LESS THAN 60
SO 0<A<60
120<B+C<180

A<0.5(B+C)
 
Last edited:
Doesn't that proof lose generality when you assume that {\sin}B={\sin}C?
 
oh yes
i should rethink it
 
Last edited:
Back
Top