2D life form can exist with alimentary canal

  • Thread starter Thread starter MartinRek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Form Life
MartinRek
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
as I read in one of Hawking books, he predicted that a 2D life-form with an alimentary canal can not exist because it would fall apart. I was wondering about that, because I thought of an easy solution for this: with two movable chainings its still possible. I have made a graphic and attached it to this post. In general its a bit off-topic (sorry for that) but I wanted to get some feedback on it.
Martin
 

Attachments

  • 2dlifeform_alimentarycanal.jpg
    2dlifeform_alimentarycanal.jpg
    32.5 KB · Views: 3,276
Physics news on Phys.org
Your life-form would hinge open at one chaining when the other is open.
What about shaping the canal like a loose-fitting jigsaw-puzzle piece?

To hold together it would still require some structural rigidity.
 
Yes, but that's only a design issue - you can build / design the chainings strong - maybe they build somehow the backbone of this life form - the graphic should just explain that there exist a way.
 
You could have lots of them along the canal too ... and you'd need to pay attention to how they hook together.

The two sides of the creature could have different charges ... the canal could be filled with a 2D version of a sticky jelly ... etc etc.
 
Amoeabas solved that. Just involve the food and push it inside in a sack.
 
Amoebas are 3D life forms, a "sack" is a 3D container ... OP is talking about 2D.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Back
Top