2D PIC simulation for untapered plasma channel

Undulator
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I would like to get ~200 MeV quasi-monoenergetic electron beam by doing 2D Particle-In-Cell simulation in bubble regime. The moving window dimension is 50x50 μm for x and y, the simulation mesh size is set 0.04x0.4 μm, each mesh includes 10 particles, laser wavelength is 800 nm, plasma density ~ 8 to 9e18 cm-3, laser pulse duration ~30 fs, normalized vector potential >3.0 and the spot size is around 9-12 μm.
I got the e-beam but the energy spread was very large. I hope someone has experiences in this simulation can help me fix some parameters. Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not finding help at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us?
 
  • Like
Likes Undulator
Hello Greg Bernhardt. I've already found the proper parameters for this PIC simulation. Thank you for your reply!
 

Thread 'Toponium Discovered'

Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
View full post »

Thread 'Dirac-Delta from Normalization of Continuous Eigenfunctions'

I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top