3 batteries, 5 resistors using KCL & KVL

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a circuit problem using Kirchhoff's Laws, specifically focusing on finding the currents flowing through the circuit and determining the voltage across each resistor. The scope includes homework-related problem-solving and mathematical reasoning involving circuit analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants emphasize the importance of correctly identifying the orientation of voltage sources in the mesh current analysis.
  • There are multiple corrections suggested regarding the equations for Loop 2 and Loop 3, with participants pointing out potential errors in voltage source values and polarity.
  • One participant proposes using software like Pspice for Nodal and Mesh Analysis to verify answers quickly.
  • Another participant expresses confusion over the sign conventions used for mesh currents and the implications for the equations derived.
  • Participants share their equations for node analysis, with some expressing uncertainty about their calculations and seeking validation from others.
  • There are indications of difficulty in expanding and collecting terms in the equations, with participants providing guidance on how to rearrange them correctly.
  • Some participants acknowledge the complexity of the problem and express their efforts to understand the material despite challenges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the correctness of the equations derived, as multiple participants point out errors and suggest corrections. The discussion remains unresolved with competing views on the proper approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential limitations in their assumptions regarding voltage source orientations and the accuracy of their algebraic manipulations. There are unresolved mathematical steps that could affect the final results.

amy1983
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1. Using Kirchhoff’s Laws, find all the currents flowing in the circuit.

2. Hence, determine the voltage across each resistor and show that all loops comply with KVL


Homework Equations



KVL and KCL



The Attempt at a Solution



Please see the pictures attached
 

Attachments

  • Problem circuit.jpg
    Problem circuit.jpg
    6.2 KB · Views: 1,013
  • potential solution pg1.jpg
    potential solution pg1.jpg
    24.2 KB · Views: 1,380
  • potential solution pg2.jpg
    potential solution pg2.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 799
Physics news on Phys.org
amy1983 said:

Homework Statement



1. Using Kirchhoff’s Laws, find all the currents flowing in the circuit.

2. Hence, determine the voltage across each resistor and show that all loops comply with KVL


Homework Equations



KVL and KCL



The Attempt at a Solution



Please see the pictures attached

Hi amy1983, Welcome to Physics Forums.

For your Loop 2 equation be careful about the orientation of the voltage sources; as you go around the loop in the direction of mesh current I2, both give potential rises.

Take another look at your Loop 3 equation. Again, pay attention to the voltage source polarity with respect to the current loop direction. Also check that you haven't inadvertently counted some voltage drops twice...
 
It's a bit confusing because you've taken clockwise mesh currents as negative. Also that loop 2 is not correct. As Gneill said, you've made an error with values of the voltage sources in that loop.
 
A good program to use for Nodal Analysis and Mesh Analysis is Pspice, for these kinds of circuits your answers can be checked very quickly.
 
Hi gneill / NewtonianAlch - thank you kindly for your welcome and for your suggestions, I will review this PM.
 
Hi g/neill / NewtonianAlch, I typed it all up and came up with the following according to your suggestions:

At node V_1,
I_1+I_2-I_3=0
⇒I_1+I_2=I_3
⇒(15-V_1)/(1 k)+(10-V_1)/(2 k)=(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)
⇒(30-2V_1 )+(10-V_1 )=(2V_1-2V_2)
⇒40-3V_1=2V_1-2V_2
⇒5V_1-2V_2=40
At node〖 V〗_2,
I_3-I_4-I_5=0
⇒I_3=I_4+I_5
⇒(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)=(5-V_2)/(1 k)+V_2/(2 k)
⇒2(V_1-V_2 )=(10-2V_2 )+V_2
⇒2V_1-V_2=10
Solving the two equations;
V_1=-20V &V_2=30V
I_1=(15-V_1)/(1 k)
⇒I_1=(15-(-20))/(1 k)
⇒I_1=35/(1 k)
⇒I_1=35mA
I_2=(10-V_1)/(2 k)
⇒I_2=(10-(-20))/(2 k)
⇒I_2=30/(2 k)
⇒I_2=15mA
I_3=(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)
⇒I_3=((-20)-30)/(1 k)
⇒I_3=(-50)/(1 k)
⇒I_3=-50mA
I_4=(5-V_2)/(1 k)
⇒I_4=(5-30)/(1 k)
⇒I_4=(-25)/(1 k)
⇒I_4=-25mA
I_5=V_2/(2 k)
⇒I_5=30/(2 k)
⇒I_5=15mA




Using KVL,
E_1-E_(R_1k )+E_(R_2k )-E_2=0
Where,
E_(R_1k )=I_1×R_1k
〖⇒E〗_(R_1k )=35×〖10〗^(-3)×1×〖10〗^3
〖⇒E〗_(R_1k )=35V

E_(R_2k )=I_2×R_2k
〖⇒E〗_(R_2k )=15×〖10〗^(-3)×2×〖10〗^3
〖⇒E〗_(R_2k )=30V
⇒E_1-E_(R_1k )+E_(R_2k )-E_2=0
⇒15-35+30-10=0
 
amy1983 said:
Hi g/neill / NewtonianAlch, I typed it all up and came up with the following according to your suggestions:

At node V_1,
I_1+I_2-I_3=0
⇒I_1+I_2=I_3
⇒(15-V_1)/(1 k)+(10-V_1)/(2 k)=(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)
⇒(30-2V_1 )+(10-V_1 )=(2V_1-2V_2)
⇒40-3V_1=2V_1-2V_2
⇒5V_1-2V_2=40
Okay, looks good for Node V1.
At node〖 V〗_2,
I_3-I_4-I_5=0
⇒I_3=I_4+I_5
⇒(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)=(5-V_2)/(1 k)+V_2/(2 k)
Oops. Check the polarity of the E3 source. Is it going to make the potential difference across R4 larger or smaller?
⇒2(V_1-V_2 )=(10-2V_2 )+V_2
⇒2V_1-V_2=10
 
At node V_1,
I_1+I_2-I_3=0
⇒I_1+I_2=I_3
⇒(15-V_1)/(1 k)+(10-V_1)/(2 k)=(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)
⇒(30-2V_1 )+(10-V_1 )=(2V_1-2V_2)
⇒40-3V_1=2V_1-2V_2
⇒5V_1-2V_2=40
At node〖 V〗_2,
I_3-I_4-I_5=0
⇒I_3=I_4+I_5
⇒(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)=(5+V_2)/(1 k)+V_2/(2 k)
⇒2(V_1-V_2 )=(10+2V_2 )+V_2
⇒2V_1-2V_2=10
Solving the two equations;
V_1=-20V &V_2=30V
I_1=(15-V_1)/(1 k)
⇒I_1=(15-(-20))/(1 k)
⇒I_1=35/(1 k)
⇒I_1=35mA
I_2=(10-V_1)/(2 k)
⇒I_2=(10-(-20))/(2 k)
⇒I_2=30/(2 k)
⇒I_2=15mA
I_3=(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)
⇒I_3=((-20)-30)/(1 k)
⇒I_3=(-50)/(1 k)
⇒I_3=-50mA
I_4=(5+V_2)/(1 k)
⇒I_4=(5+30)/(1 k)
⇒I_4=35/(1 k)
⇒I_4=35mA
I_5=V_2/(2 k)
⇒I_5=30/(2 k)
⇒I_5=15mA

Using KVL,
E_1-E_(R_1k )+E_(R_2k )-E_2=0
Where,
E_(R_1k )=I_1×R_1k
〖⇒E〗_(R_1k )=35×〖10〗^(-3)×1×〖10〗^3
〖⇒E〗_(R_1k )=35V

E_(R_2k )=I_2×R_2k
〖⇒E〗_(R_2k )=15×〖10〗^(-3)×2×〖10〗^3
〖⇒E〗_(R_2k )=30V
⇒E_1-E_(R_1k )+E_(R_2k )-E_2=0
⇒15-35+30-10=0
Hi gneill, Thank you for your advice. Does the remainder of the equation look okay?
 
amy1983 said:
At node V_1,
I_1+I_2-I_3=0
⇒I_1+I_2=I_3
⇒(15-V_1)/(1 k)+(10-V_1)/(2 k)=(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)
⇒(30-2V_1 )+(10-V_1 )=(2V_1-2V_2)
⇒40-3V_1=2V_1-2V_2
⇒5V_1-2V_2=40
At node〖 V〗_2,
I_3-I_4-I_5=0
⇒I_3=I_4+I_5
⇒(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)=(5+V_2)/(1 k)+V_2/(2 k)
⇒2(V_1-V_2 )=(10+2V_2 )+V_2
⇒2V_1-2V_2=10
Oops again. I think you added the V_2's from the right hand side to the left hand side rather than subtracting them from both sides. But you're getting there...
 
  • #10
I_3-I_4-I_5=0
⇒I_3=I_4+I_5
⇒(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)=(5+V_2)/(1 k)+V_2/(2 k)
⇒2(V_1-V_2 )=(10+2V_2 )+V_2
⇒2V_1-2V_2=10V_2+2V_2
⇒2V_1=10V_2
⇒2V_1-V_2=10

I know it's bad, but I am finding this electrical element difficult.
:/ Worst case scenario if I put up what I have at least it shows I made the effort!
 
  • #11
amy1983 said:
I_3-I_4-I_5=0
⇒I_3=I_4+I_5
⇒(V_1-V_2)/(1 k)=(5+V_2)/(1 k)+V_2/(2 k)
⇒2(V_1-V_2 )=(10+2V_2 )+V_2
⇒2V_1-2V_2=10V_2+2V_2
You seem to be having difficulty expanding and then collecting terms. On the LHS you've got: 2*V1 - 2*V2. On the RHS you've got: 10 + 2*V2 + V2 = 10 + 3*V2. So:

2*V1 - 2*V2 = 10 + 3*V2

Move the 3*V2 from the RHS to the LHS by subtracting 3*V2 from both sides. Then proceed.
I know it's bad, but I am finding this electrical element difficult.
:/ Worst case scenario if I put up what I have at least it shows I made the effort!

I know it can be tricky, and much of circuit analysis involves a good deal of finicky algebra. But you are indeed showing good effort and insight for what you need to do to get the result. As they say, the devil is in the details :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K