3 Vectors from a Common Point onto a Plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three vectors, \(\vec A\), \(\vec B\), and \(\vec C\), originating from a common point and having their heads in a plane. The task is to demonstrate that the expression \(\vec A \times \vec B + \vec B \times \vec C + \vec C \times \vec A\) is perpendicular to the plane defined by these vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of simplifying the problem by assuming the vectors are in the same plane and explore the implications of this assumption. There is mention of using the definition of cross products and the need to relate the angles between the vectors. Some participants suggest finding vectors parallel to the plane and question how to approach this without specific information about the plane. Others propose using dot products to demonstrate perpendicularity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and guidance on avoiding certain methods, such as breaking the vectors into components. There is an exploration of the triple scalar product and its relevance to the problem. Participants are considering how many dot products are necessary to establish the perpendicularity of the expression to the plane.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of information about the plane itself, which participants are trying to address through the relationships between the vectors. The discussion includes considerations of assumptions regarding the vectors and their arrangement.

YayMathYay
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three vectors, \vec A, \vec B, \vec C originiate from a common point, and have their heads in a plane.
Show that \vec A \times \vec B + \vec B \times \vec C + \vec C \times \vec A is perpendicular to the plane.

Homework Equations



I'm not exactly sure, but probably solvable with the definition of a cross product (or even without it?)


The Attempt at a Solution



First, I attempted to simplify the problem by assuming all three vectors were in the same plane, and that they all pointed to a line (simplified version of a plane). However, it turned out that the sum of the three cross products seem to be parallel, not perpendicular to the plane/line.

Then, I tried solving the problem using the mathematical definition of cross products, after assigning angles between each pair of vectors. However I'm not sure how to relate the three.

I'm guessing this may need to be solved by breaking the vectors down into components, or there is a much simpler method that I'm just not seeing.. I'd really appreciate it if someone can give me a hint or point me in the right direction! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you find vectors which are parallel to the plane?
What is the angle between those vectors and a vector perpendicular to the plane?
Which operation is useful to check that?

I'm guessing this may need to be solved by breaking the vectors down into components
No, don't do that.
 
And, adding to mfb's advice, no, don't break it into components. Do you have the theorem that you can interchange dot and cross in a triple scalar product?
 
LCKurtz said:
And, adding to mfb's advice, no, don't break it into components. Do you have the theorem that you can interchange dot and cross in a triple scalar product?

Yes, we learned the triple scalar product.
 
mfb said:
Can you find vectors which are parallel to the plane?

I was thinking about this, but wasn't sure how to go about this.. since we're not given information about the plane itself. I guess maybe by using the 3 vectors I can piece out the plane?

EDIT: As in, \vec A - \vec B, etc. would be parallel to the plane?
 
YayMathYay said:
I was thinking about this, but wasn't sure how to go about this.. since we're not given information about the plane itself. I guess maybe by using the 3 vectors I can piece out the plane?

EDIT: As in, \vec A - \vec B, etc. would be parallel to the plane?

Yes, it would.
 
Dick said:
Yes, it would.

Ah, so you would you take dot products of these differences with the given expression and prove that it equals zero?
 
YayMathYay said:
Ah, so you would you take dot products of these differences with the given expression and prove that it equals zero?

That's the idea. How many difference dot products would you need to show are zero?
 
Dick said:
That's the idea. How many difference dot products would you need to show are zero?

3, then. Thanks so much! :)
 
  • #10
YayMathYay said:
3, then. Thanks so much! :)

You could do 3, but you only need two vectors to span a plane. 1 wouldn't be enough.
 
  • #11
The third one is trivial anyway:

If ##X \cdot (A-B)=0## and ##X \cdot (B-C)=0## , then ##X \cdot ((A-B)+(B-C))=X \cdot (A-C)=0##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K