News What are Hawk and Dove in US politics ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    politics
AI Thread Summary
In U.S. politics, the terms "left-wing" and "right-wing" represent the liberal and conservative ends of the political spectrum, respectively. A hawk advocates for war, while a dove supports peace. The political landscape has evolved, with neo-conservatism shifting the center rightward, often equating liberalism with socialism and communism. This has led to a distortion of traditional political labels, making it difficult to define what constitutes a liberal or conservative today. The discussion highlights that while hawks and doves are often used to describe attitudes toward war, their application has become less relevant in contemporary debates, particularly regarding conflicts like Iraq. Additionally, the complexity of political beliefs means that issues such as trade do not fit neatly into these categories, indicating a more nuanced understanding of political identity is necessary.
Saint
Messages
437
Reaction score
0
:wink:
What do they mean in US politic?
And, what are left-wing and right-wing ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A basically, hawk is someone who wants war, a dove is someone who doesn't.
Left and Right are the ends of the political spectrum. Left is "liberal" and right is "conservative" - that applies to the politics of just about any nation.
 
So, Bush is Hawk, and Clinton is Dove?
 
Communism-------socialism----------X----------federalism-------Fascism

Here is a simple political spectrum. Ideally, democracy encompasses the egalitarian center between socialism and federalism.(X) Totalitarian states lie along the line outward from socialism to communism and from federalism to fascism.
Liberal and conservative should be within the democratic center of the spectrum. However, in american politics this is more and more distorted by neo conservatism which occupies the line somewhere between federalism and fascism. Neoconservatives equate liberalism with socialism and communism. The center then, tends to drift rightward.
 
You can forget all of that, except for HAVOC451's post...maybe. At this point every U.S. politician is professionally hawkish. The only difference is in degree.

As far as "liberal" and "conservative"? Your guess is as good as mine; the labels have been so corrupted over the years, especially "conservative", that there is no simple answer.
 
"The Hawk and Dove" is a nice tavern on capital hill in DC.

Hawks favor war, doves favor peace. One can be generally hawkish, or dovish, or, one can be a hawk on Iraq, and a Dove on Bosnia for instance. It is not a great system for labelling. One irony is that almost all generals oppose almost all wars. Should we really label them doves?

Left-wing and right-wing are generlly the extremes of liberal and conservative, respectively. It is a bit clumsy, as there are multiple facets to what makes one liberal or conservative. There are also big issues, like trade, which defy labelling.

Njorl
 
Actually the Hawks and Doves were special to the Vietnam war. Although there are a lot of opponents of the Iraq war, and a lot of enthusiasts for it, I haven't seen the terms hawk and dove used recently.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top