3D vector collsions- do u terat them differently?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ku1005
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the differences in handling 3D vector collisions compared to 2D vectors. The user initially attempted to solve intersection problems using the same principles as in 2D, leading to incorrect conclusions. Key points include the realization that the parameters T and B in the equations for lines L1 and L2 do not need to be equal, and that two lines in 3D may not intersect at all. The correct approach involves solving the equations for T and B separately and checking if they satisfy all conditions for intersection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector equations in 3D space
  • Familiarity with calculus for minimizing distances
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts, particularly regarding lines and planes
  • Experience with solving systems of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method for solving systems of equations in three dimensions
  • Learn about vector calculus and its application in minimizing distances
  • Explore the concept of vector projections in 3D space
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of line intersections in 3D
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and computer graphics who are dealing with 3D vector calculations, particularly in collision detection and distance minimization problems.

ku1005
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
3D vector collsions- do u terat them differently??

hi upon attemptin the following questions, in which i just answered the Questions in the same manner as i would with a 2D vector, i keep getting them wrong and was hoping sum1 could tell me where my thinking is flawed:

Proove that L1 and L2 intersect, finding th position vecor of the point:

L1 = 13i+j+8k + T(2i-j+3k)

L2= -5i+2j-3k + B(2i+j-k)

i simply said for them to intersect let them have the same x y z coordinates at some time/point T (ie let T and B = T)

so that (13+2T)i+(1-T)j+(8+3T)k = (-5+2T)i + (2+T)j + (-3-T)k

such that set each coordinate equal to each other ie

13+2T = -5+2T
1-T = 2+T
8+3T = -3-T and if T value is equal for each point therefore intersect for that value of T...however since i am on here this obviously doesnlt work,
the answ is 3i+6j-7k

another question involves finding the least distance between 2 particles, where again i applied same principles for 2D vecotrs in 3D vectors (ie minimise a length between the 2 bodies using calculus) however it dosnlt work either , so i am hoping somethin in this Q will unlock the key to my mistakes in the others...thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ku1005 said:
hi upon attemptin the following questions, in which i just answered the Questions in the same manner as i would with a 2D vector, i keep getting them wrong and was hoping sum1 could tell me where my thinking is flawed:

Proove that L1 and L2 intersect, finding th position vecor of the point:

L1 = 13i+j+8k + T(2i-j+3k)

L2= -5i+2j-3k + B(2i+j-k)

i simply said for them to intersect let them have the same x y z coordinates at some time/point T (ie let T and B = T)
Here's your problem. T and B do not have to be equal. You have, in fact, three equations for two unknown numbers, T and B, not one. Thats true even in 2D!

so that (13+2T)i+(1-T)j+(8+3T)k = (-5+2T)i + (2+T)j + (-3-T)k

such that set each coordinate equal to each other ie

13+2T = -5+2T
1-T = 2+T
8+3T = -3-T and if T value is equal for each point therefore intersect for that value of T...however since i am on here this obviously doesnlt work,
the answ is 3i+6j-7k
Try solving 13+ 2T= -5+ 2B, 1- T= 2+ B, 8+ 3T= -3- B for T and B. Of course, in general, you cannot solve 3 equations for 2 "unknowns" since, in general, two lines in 3 dimensions do not intersect. Solve two of the equations for T and B and then check to see if those values satisfy the third.

Determining whether 2 lines intersect is not the same as a "vector collision". If you think of the equations for the lines as giving the positions of particles, moving on those lines, as a function of time, then in order for the particles to collide they would have to reach the same point at the same time. If the two lines intersect, it is possible for the particles to pass through the same point at different times.

another question involves finding the least distance between 2 particles, where again i applied same principles for 2D vecotrs in 3D vectors (ie minimise a length between the 2 bodies using calculus) however it dosnlt work either , so i am hoping somethin in this Q will unlock the key to my mistakes in the others...thanks
Show what you have done on this one. Certainly minimizing the distance (or distance square- its easier) will give the point of closest approach whether in 2D or 3D.
 
this was the questions, "an aircraft is maintaining a constant velocity of (80i+50j+5k) m/s, the units vecotrs being indictaed as on the right (ie a image showing that upwards = k axis, east = i axis and north = j axis. At 1 pm the aircraft is situated 5km south and 10km west of a trackin station situated at O (ie origin- 0,0,0)The aircrafts altitiude is 500m.

I could anwer all Q's (ie 6 part) except this one

e)Find the least distance between the aircraft and tracking station.

I did the follwing:

I let intial positon of the aircraft = A and the point at which the aircrft is closest = P.

Therefore expressed

Vector OA= (-10i-5j+0.5k)km (yes i used km this time since i used metres the other time an end up with the same incorrect answer)

Vector AP= (-10+0.08t)i + (-5+0.05t)j + (0.5 +0.005t)k

Given Vector OP = OA + AP
=(-20+0.08t)i + (-5+0.05t) j + (0.5 + 0.005t)k

Therefore need to minimise Ab value of OP = distance or (OP)^2 = D^2(distance squared)

(-20+0.08t)^2+(-10+0.05t)^2+(1 + 0.005t)^2 = D^2
where t= 234.73

which isnlt correct since the answer is ~1.52 km (ie once u sub answer t bak in of course)
 
and by the way, thanks heaps for that, i don't know where i got that T and B should be equal...since they are mutilplying diff velocity vecotrs (direction vecotrs of the line) adn therefore in no way should be equal, it is ikely that i this Q I am doing the same thing...but i put all my working regardless...
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
39K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K