3x3 Matrix Differential Equations

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a system of differential equations using eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Participants confirm the eigenvalues as 0, 1, and 3, and discuss deriving the corresponding eigenvectors, which are crucial for finding the general solution. The method involves reducing the matrix to find the nullspace and using the eigenvectors to form a diagonal matrix. The final solution is expressed in terms of the original variables, showing how the eigenvalues influence the behavior of the system over time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly calculating eigenvectors and the diagonalization process for solving 3x3 systems.
DODGEVIPER13
Messages
668
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the general solution to the system of differential equations.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I uploaded the original equation and my work so see the attachment. I want to know how they got the vectors the got typically when I have done 2x2 systems I row reduce them and then use the top row that is left over and get the transverse and that is my vector however this did not work this time, what do I do?
 

Attachments

  • EPSON001.jpg
    EPSON001.jpg
    26.9 KB · Views: 567
Physics news on Phys.org
From my understanding, you need to find the eigenvector/s corresponding to each eigenvalue and the required answer is the sum of the basis vectors (eigenvectors) within the matrix containing all the eigenvectors. The constants, a, b and c are real constant multiples (can take any value) of the eigvenvectors.
 
Ok but how did they get the answers they got because I am getting totally opposite
 
OK, i can confirm your eigenvalues are correct: 0, 3 and 1.

For eigenvalue = 0, i get the same eigenvector as in the expected answer: (1,1,1)^T

What i did was reduce the matrix with that eigenvalue = 0, and found the special solution (using linear algebra, it's the nullspace).

Now, for the other two eigenvalues, i would expect to get the rest of the answers.

You have clearly miscalculated the eigenvectors.

For eigenvalue = 3, i get the eigenvector: (1, -2, 1)^T.

For eigenvalue = 1, i get the eigenvector: (-1, 0, 1)^T, which is equivalent (multiply by scalar value of -1) to (1, 0, -1)^T.

Since there is a multiple of e^t involved with the eigenvectors, i assume that you have not posted the entire problem.

Note: If you are familiar with finding the nullspace in linear algebra, you should be able to work it out. Also, in your work you take the trace of the matrix as λ-{value} but i guess it's just a matter of different method, since i personally use {value}-λ as the trace elements of the matrix. I guess either way you'll get the same results, since you were able to get the same eigenvalues.
 
Last edited:
ok cool I think I can get it now ill let you know soon.
 
If a 3 by 3 matrix has three independent eigenvectors, then it can be "diagonalized". Here, the eigenvalues are, as you say, 0, 1, and 3. An eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue 0 is <1, 1, 1>, an eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue 1 is <-1, 0, 1>, and an eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue 3 is <1, -2, 1>. The matrix having those eigenvectors as columns is
P= \begin{bmatrix}-1 &amp; 1 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 1 &amp; -2 \\ 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 1\end{bmatrix}
and its inverse is
P^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix}-\frac{1}{2} &amp; 0 &amp; \frac{1}{2}\\ \frac{1}{3} &amp; \frac{1}{3} &amp; \frac{1}{3} \\ \frac{1}{6} &amp; -\frac{1}{3} &amp; \frac{1}{6}\end{bmatrix}
and now it is easy to check that
D= P^{-1}AP= \begin{bmatrix}1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 3\end{bmatrix}
the diagonal matrix with the eigenvalues on the diagonal.

Now go back to Y'= AY, the differerential equation. We can multiply both sides, on the left, by P^{-1} to get P^{-1}Y&#039;= P^{-1}AY. And, since P has only constant entries, and PP^{-1}= I, we can write that as (P^{-1}Y)&#039;= P^{-1}APP^{-1}Y= D(P^{-1}Y) or, letting z= P^{-1}Y, z&#039;= Dz which is just
\begin{bmatrix}z_1(t) \\ z_2(t) \\ z_3(t)\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 3\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}z_1(t) \\ z_2(t) \\ z_3(t)\end{bmatrix}
which is equivalent to the three separate equations z_1&#039;= z_1, z_2&#039;= 0, and z_3&#039;= 3z_3 which, of course, have solutions z_1(t)= C_1e^t, z_2= C_2, z_3= C_3e^{3t}.

Now, because Z= P^{-1}Y, Y= PZ just multiply
Y= \begin{bmatrix}-1 &amp; 1 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 1 &amp; -2 \\ 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 1\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}C_1e^t \\ C_2 \\ C_3e^{3t}\end{bmatrix} to get
y_1(t)= -C_1e^t+ C_2+ C_3e^{3t}
y_2(t)= C_2- 2C_3e^{3t} and
y_3(t)= C_1e^t+ C_2+ C_3e^{3t}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K