41430 Arietis Quadruple Star System

  • Thread starter Thread starter |Glitch|
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the 41430 Arietis quadruple star system and the potential for life on the exoplanet 30 Ari Bb. It is noted that 30 Ari Bb is too close to its star to support liquid water, as it lies outside the 'conservative habitable zone' defined by Kopparapu et al. (2014). However, calculations factoring in albedo suggest that an Earth-like moon could maintain surface water despite extreme temperature fluctuations. The system's youth, at 910 million years, raises questions about the current presence of life, but the potential for future evolution remains if liquid water is available. Further information on the stellar companion of 30 Ari A is sought to deepen understanding of the system.
|Glitch|
Messages
428
Reaction score
117
I read an article (Planet 'Reared' by Four Parent Stars) the other day and came across the statement: "Astronomers think it's highly unlikely that this planet, or any moons that might circle it, could sustain life." I began to wonder why, but there was no further explanation in the article.

So I began to learn more about the system, beginning with the original papers (see below). I was able to get all the information I needed for 30 Ari A & B, but only the approximate mass (~0.5 M☉) of 30 Ari C, which is suppose to be the newly discovered red dwarf star 24 AU from 30 Ari B. I was not able to find any information on 30 Ari A's stellar companion, not even its name or catalog number. If anyone can help me locate information on what should be 30 Ari D [?], I would be very grateful.

With regard to whether 30 Ari Bb could sustain life, according to Kopparapu et al. (2014) (see below), the 'conservative habitable zone' for 30 Ari B should be between 1.28 and 2.23 AU. Since the exoplanet 30 Ari Bb is 0.995 AU from its star, it would appear to be too close to its star to support liquid water on the surface of any of its moons.

However, Kopparapu et al. (2014) does not factor in albedo. An Earth-like moon with an albedo of 32.5%, and a semi-major axis of 5 million km from 30 Ari Bb would have an orbit of 23.2 days, with mean surface temperatures ranging from 28.7°C to 11.1°C with each orbit. The temperatures were calculated using the Stefan-Boltzmann law and factoring in for albedo, but does not include radiative forcing or allowances for atmospheric pressure.

A temperature shift of 17.6°C every 11.6 days seems rather extreme. I am not sure how life would evolve in such an environment, but it is still capable of supporting liquid water on its surface. An Earth-like moon with a semi-major axis of 5 million km from 30 Ari Bb should also not be tidally locked.

Jupiter has 67 confirmed moons. Certainly an exoplanet with 10 Jupiter masses must also have a large number of moons. Granted the 30 Ari B solar system is only 910 million years old, so it is unlikely that there is any kind of life on any of those moons currently. But I still see no reason why life could not eventually evolve, as long as liquid surface water is present.

If anyone can point out what I am missing, it would be appreciated.

Sources:
Know the Star, Know the Planet. III. Discovery of Late-Type Companions to Two Exoplanet Host Stars - arXiv : 1503.01211v1 [PDF]
A substellar component orbiting the F-star 30 Ari B - arXiv : 0912.4619v1 [PDF]
Habitable Zones Around Main-Sequence Stars: Dependence on Planetary Mass - arXiv : 1404.5292v2 [PDF]
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
|Glitch| said:
However, Kopparapu et al. (2014) does not factor in albedo.
Are you sure about that?
Kopparapu et al.: 2.Model Description said:
H2O and CO2 clouds were neglected in the model, but the effect of the former is accounted for by increasing the surface albedo, as done in previous climate simulations by the Kasting research group
 
Bandersnatch said:
Are you sure about that?
Pretty sure
We used a 1D, radiative-convective, cloud-free climate model from Kopparapu et al.(2013).
[emphasis added]

They certainly make numerous references to albedo, but there model does not appear to include it.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top