4x4 determinant using upper triangular form

  • Thread starter Thread starter aznkid310
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Form
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the determinant of a 4x4 matrix using upper triangular form. The initial calculation led to an incorrect result of 275, while the expected answer is zero. Participants suggest reviewing the steps taken, particularly the last row in the second transformation. The importance of accuracy in each step of the row reduction process is emphasized. Ultimately, the correct determinant calculation should yield zero, indicating a potential error in the row operations performed.
aznkid310
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] 4x4 determinant using upper triangular form

Homework Statement



|2 0 1 4|
|3 2 -4 -2|
|2 3 -1 0|
|11 8 -4 6|


Homework Equations



Ive done this a number of times and i still can't get the answer. I ended up w/ 275, but the answer is suppose to be zero

The Attempt at a Solution



1) 2 * |1 0 0.5 2|
|3 2 -4 -2|
|2 3 -1 0|
|11 8 -4 6|

2) 2* |1 0 0.5 2|
|0 2 -5.5 -8|
|0 3 -2 -4|
|0 8 -9.5 -5|

3) (2)(2)*|1 0 0.5 2|
| 0 1 -2.75 -4|
|0 3 -2 -4|
|0 8 -9.5 -5|

4) (2)(2)*|1 0 0.5 2|
| 0 1 -2.75 -4|
|0 0 6.25 8|
|0 0 12.5 27|

5) (2)(2)(6.25)* |1 0 0.5 2|
|0 1 -2.75 -4|
|0 0 1 (32/25)|
|0 0 0 11|

Determinant = 11*2*2*6.25 = 275
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aznkid310 said:
2) 2* |1 0 0.5 2|
|0 2 -5.5 -8|
|0 3 -2 -4|
|0 8 -9.5 -5|
I would double-check your last row carefully for step 2.
 
ah i see! Thanks for pointing that out.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top