Friction and Tension along a Curved Path

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a project involving a beam pinned at one end and moving along a curved path, with a tension force acting at an angle and a coefficient of friction present. The main question is to determine the angles at which the beam remains in static equilibrium. Participants suggest that clearer visuals and a more precise question would facilitate better responses. There is an emphasis on ensuring that homework guidelines are followed when seeking help. The thread highlights the importance of clarity in problem presentation for effective assistance.
aeb2335
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I just want to make sure my thinking and free body is correct before I go further in a project I am working on; for some strange reason (probably the curved path) I am doubting myself.

I will try and explain the problem but the attached image is probably the best description.

There is a beam that is pinned at A on one end and free to move along a path of constant curvature (a circle) at the other end; There is a force of tension FT that acts on the beam at an angle θ with a coefficient of friction of μs. Neglect gravity.
 

Attachments

  • SCAN0201.jpg
    SCAN0201.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 452
Physics news on Phys.org
I expect if you were to post your information a bit more legibly and actually state your question you might receive an answer.

If this is homework then you should read the instructions about posting it.
 
Can you redraw the graph? Its not clear to me and I have bad eyes :(
 
Yea I never really did state the actual problem I got a bit too excited. The question is for what angles theta phi and gamma does the beam stay in static equilibrium. I will re-post a better picture shortly.
 
Lmao!
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top