7.3 Magnitude Quake Hits North Japan

  • Thread starter Thread starter gmax137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Japan Magnitude
AI Thread Summary
A 7.3 magnitude earthquake struck northern Japan, prompting a tsunami advisory for Fukushima and Miyagi prefectures, with expected wave heights of up to 1 meter. The quake had a depth of 60 kilometers and was preceded by a 6.4 magnitude tremor just two minutes earlier. An aftershock measuring 5.5 occurred shortly after, indicating ongoing seismic activity in the region. The depth of these earthquakes is considered moderate, potentially reducing tsunami risk compared to shallower quakes. The seismic events are attributed to the subduction of the Pacific Plate under the Okhotsk Plate, reflecting Japan's complex geological dynamics.
gmax137
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Messages
3,124
Reaction score
3,582
TL;DR Summary
7.3 Magnitude Quake Hits North Japan, Tsunami Alert Issued
3-16-2022_quake.JPG
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...e-quake-hits-north-japan-tsunami-alert-issued
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Yikes. That's not good...

Although, if it really is only 1 meter above normal tidal levels, that's a lot less than the previous one, right?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/16/asia/japan-earthquake-fukushima-intl/index.html

The tsunami advisory was made for Fukushima and Miyagi prefectures in eastern Japan following the quake that had a preliminary epicenter depth of 60 kilometers (37 miles), according to the Japan Meteorological Agency.

The advisory warns of tsunami heights reaching up to 1 meter above normal tidal levels, with the initial waves reaching shore around midnight local time (11 a.m. ET).
 

M 7.3 - 57 km ENE of Namie, Japan​

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000h519/executive
  • 2022-03-16 14:36:33 (UTC)
  • 37.702°N 141.587°E
  • 63.1 km depth
The Mag 7.3 was preceded by a Mag 6.4 earthquake occurring only 2 minutes before and slightly shallower.

M 6.4 - 62 km ENE of Namie, Japan​

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000h518/executive
  • 2022-03-16 14:34:27 (UTC)
  • 37.633°N 141.685°E
  • 56.3 km depth
An aftershock

M 5.5 - 77 km SE of Ishinomaki, Japan​

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000h518/executive
  • 2022-03-16 15:52:31 (UTC)
  • 37.853°N 141.827°E
  • 67.2 km depth (slightly deeper than the Mag 7.3)
 
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970
Those earthquakes are very deep.
Maybe they are aftershocks of the big tsunami earthquake.
 
Baluncore said:
Those earthquakes are very deep.
Maybe they are aftershocks of the big tsunami earthquake.
I would consider that a moderate depth, but perhaps enough to mitigate a tsunami. Of course, it all depends on how and how much of the ocean floor and volume of ocean water is displaced.

In contrast, the 9.1/9.2 Mag Great Tohoku earthquake of 2011 was at a depth of 29 km.
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/official20110311054624120_30/executive

M 9.1 - 2011 Great Tohoku Earthquake, Japan​

  • 2011-03-11 05:46:24 (UTC)
  • 38.297°N 142.373°E
  • 29.0 km depth
Rather than aftershocks, the current quakes are simply part of the ongoing seismic activity induced by the flow of the seafloor under crust of which Japan is a part, i.e., subduction of the western edge of the Pacific Plate under the Okhotsk Plate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Trench#Seismicity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okhotsk_Plate
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/official20110311054624120_30/dyfi/intensity
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Back
Top