1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A Basic Function Problem with a Limit

  1. Sep 24, 2009 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    For all real numbers x and y, let f be a function such that f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)+2xy and such that the limit as h approaches zero is f(h)/h=7. [tex]\stackrel{Lim}{h\rightarrow0}\frac{f(h)}{h} = 7[/tex]

    a) Find f(0) and justify your answer.

    b) Use the definition of the derivative to find f ' (x).

    c) Find f(x).

    NO CALCULATOR USE ALLOWED!


    2. Relevant equations

    Limit as h->0 is (f(x+h)-f(x))/h

    3. The attempt at a solution

    To solve part a, I looked at the original equation. To find f(0), I just put in 0 for x and 0 for y.

    Let x=y=0.

    And thus, I got f(0)=0, so now part a should be cleared. Right?

    Then I get to part b and I'm a little stuck. Find f ' (x) ? Should I be using the equation I put in the relevant equations section to help me out with this?
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2009
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 24, 2009 #2
    The definition of the derivative is the equation that you gave, so yes.
     
  4. Sep 24, 2009 #3
    OKay, so here goes my shot at part b (do you think part a is right?):

    f ' (x) is ....


    (f(x+7) - f(x)) / 7

    Hm ... I'm getting a little lost here. I just substituted h for 7.

    Also, is there a way to post these fractions using the latex reference?
     
  5. Sep 24, 2009 #4
    you want to start with:
    [tex]\stackrel{Lim}{h\rightarrow0}\frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{h}[/tex]


    What can you say about f(x + h)?

    to do the fractions, just use \frac{}{} where the numerator goes in the first bracket pair and the denominator goes in the second.
     
  6. Sep 24, 2009 #5
    Thanks for letting me know about the fractions part.

    For f(x+h), I was thinking that would just be equal to f(x) since h is approaching zero. However ...

    [tex]\stackrel{Lim}{h\rightarrow0}\frac{f(h)}{h} = 7[/tex]

    Which doesn't make sense anyway since that would be undefined as h approaches zero. Hm ....
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2009
  7. Sep 24, 2009 #6
    You have the formula for f(x + [strike]y[/strike]h) in your original post ;)
     
  8. Sep 24, 2009 #7
    Also, [tex]\stackrel{Lim}{h\rightarrow0}\frac{f(h)}{h} = 7[/tex] according to your original post. You edited it but left the old version. Which one is it?
     
  9. Sep 24, 2009 #8
    Sorry, the limit as h goes to zero is definitely SEVEN. :smile:

    So how about this. I was thinking that since I could do this ....

    f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + 2xy
    f(x+y) - f(x) = f(y) + 2xy

    Then couldn't I say that since h is approaching zero, then it figures that:

    x=y=0=h as well. I can then substitute the h's in for x or y?

    Am I on the right track here?
     
  10. Sep 24, 2009 #9
    well f(x+h) - f(x) = f(h) + 2xh is right but that's inside a limit and over h as h goes to zero.

    now, as I'm sure you know, the sum of limits is the limit of sums. So do it like that. There is no y in this equation and you can't set x to a value because you're taking the limit for all x so it needs to remain a variable.
     
  11. Sep 24, 2009 #10
    I'm not sure what to do what you said, because we never discussed limits in my class yet.
     
  12. Sep 24, 2009 #11
    Ok. I don't think there's a way to do this without limits as they're in the problem as stated so the rule you want is:
    [tex]\lim_{h\to a}(f(h) + g(h)) = \lim_{h\to a} f(h) + \lim_{h\to a} g(a) [/tex]

    See if that helps.
     
  13. Sep 24, 2009 #12

    I think this problem requires knowledge of limits, although I never learned that last year (I think my teacher expected us to know from last year).

    So for part b:

    f ' (x) = [tex]\lim_{h\to 0} (f(x+h)/h) + \lim_{h\to 0} f(x)[/tex]

    Hopefully this is on the right track.
     
  14. Sep 24, 2009 #13
    That's the idea but do you remember how to expand f(x + h)?

    Just keep it in one limit until you have expanded f(x + h) and the f(x) cancels out like it did before. And remember that when a sum is on top of a fraction, the denominator goes with both sides of the sum if you split it up!

    [tex]\frac{a + b}{c} = \frac{a}{c} + \frac{b}{c}[/tex]
     
  15. Sep 24, 2009 #14
    Revised version.

    f ' (x) = [tex]\lim_{h\to 0} ((f(x+h)/h) + f(x/h))[/tex]
     
  16. Sep 24, 2009 #15
    And, no I do not know how to expand f(x + h). I know this is easy once I understand the concept but I'm really new to it, sorry.
     
  17. Sep 24, 2009 #16
    That's ok. Look at your original post and post #8 and #9 in this thread. You've already done it
     
  18. Sep 24, 2009 #17
    Really?

    So do I substitute f(h) + 2xh for f(x+h) - f(x) now?

    I'm still a bit confused, sorry.
     
  19. Sep 24, 2009 #18
    No problem.

    Try it and see what happens. Post your results!
     
  20. Sep 24, 2009 #19
    [tex]\stackrel{Lim}{h\rightarrow0}\frac{f(y) + 2xy}{h}[/tex]

    Do I put an equal sign after or before the limit part?
     
  21. Sep 24, 2009 #20
    Ok, where is the y coming from?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: A Basic Function Problem with a Limit
  1. Basic Limit problems (Replies: 18)

  2. Basic Limit problem? (Replies: 1)

  3. Basic Limit Problem (Replies: 2)

Loading...